Teams

GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Niederleig)(EPTC#4)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesPaola Rojas Miranda / Carolina Adame vs Victoria Dominguez / Christine Gomez4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSuleima Villa vs Brianda Van0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnayancy Roldan / Andrea Prado vs Gabriela Navarro / Ester Rodriguez6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-04Split 11
L#1 DoublesPaola Rojas Miranda / Carolina Adame vs Cristina Gonzalez / Fernanda Fiscal1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMaira Rico vs Iva Ivanova6-2, 6-3
2024-04-29vs GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Lechuga)(FB)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSuleima Villa / Maira Rico vs Barbara Maya / Danyelle Barnett2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPaola Rojas Miranda vs Sherrill Isenhower0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNayely Ruiz / Anayancy Roldan vs CIndy Acosta / Gemma Ridland6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-04-22vs GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Porras)(CCC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSuleima Villa / Nayely Ruiz vs Maggie Lindner / Ronnie Martinez3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAndrea Prado vs Regina Porras0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarolina Adame / Dayana Porres vs Megan Mcfadden / Stefanie Welsch2-6, 0-6
2024-04-08Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJanessa Figueroa / Anevay Davila vs Maria del Carmen Ledezma / Sara Blanco0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesNayely Ruiz vs Cecilia Marquez3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Prado / Anayancy Roldan vs Karin Delafuente / Clara C Esparza0-6, 5-7
2024-04-01Lost 12
L#1 DoublesPaola Rojas Miranda / Suleima Villa vs Yvonne Houghton / Destiny Blanchette2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMaira Rico vs Lilly Gutierrez Molina6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNayely Ruiz / Nayeli Moreno vs Roxanna Medina / Rose Rivera2-6, 4-6
2024-03-29vs GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Bordier)(EPTC#2)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCarolina Adame / Andrea Prado vs Luisa Franco / Michelle Bordier1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesNayeli Moreno vs Mariel Rubio1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSuleima Villa / Maira Rico vs Rosario Samaniego / Valeria Ocana7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-03-25vs GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Jabor)(EPCC#1)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAnevay Davila / Janessa Figueroa vs Angela Darancou / Karyna Vargas0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesNayeli Moreno vs Cassidy Cybriwsky1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPaola Rojas Miranda / Andrea Prado vs Beatrice Heist / Allison White0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 2024 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Wilcox/18&over/2.5W8018612137
2GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Fernandez)(EPTC#1)44141023190
3GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(McCarthy)(EPTC#3)44121224210
4GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Bordier)(EPTC#2)35121225188
5GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Niederleig)(EPTC#4)1751940254

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.58
Carolina Adame
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.49
Anayancy Roldan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Andrea Prado
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Anevay Davila
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Dayana Porres
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Henrick Niederleig
published
Janessa Figueroa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Maira Rico
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Nayeli Moreno
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Nayely Ruiz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Paola Rojas Miranda
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Suleima Villa
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paola Rojas Miranda + Carolina Adame3741% gamesnot enough data
Suleima Villa + Maira Rico3250% gamesnot enough data
Suleima Villa + Nayely Ruiz033 matchesnot enough data
Nayely Ruiz + Nayeli Moreno213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Carolina Adame
11W–13L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%30%70%
2.58
2.5
Anayancy Roldan
16W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%53%47%
2.49
2.5
Andrea Prado
2W–9L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Anevay Davila
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Dayana Porres
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Henrick Niederleig
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Janessa Figueroa
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maira Rico
5W–2L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nayeli Moreno
12W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nayely Ruiz
14W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Paola Rojas Miranda
16W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Suleima Villa
21W–30L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.