Teams

Battlefield Ball Busters

2022 Fredericksburg Adult 18 & Over Spring · Fredericksburg Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-06vs Serve and SipLost 01
L#1 DoublesDebbie Kem / Lisa Palmer vs Judith Jobrack / Lana King4-6, 0-6
2022-05-15vs Serve and SipWon 10
W#2 DoublesFrances Bouffard / Kathryn Davis vs Sharon Curlee / Terry Sumner6-1, 6-1
2022-05-14vs TNT WomenWon 10
W#1 DoublesFrances Bouffard / Mary Jane Wooldridge vs Teresa Wallendjack / Debbie Rhoades6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2022-04-30vs TNT WomenLost 02
L#1 DoublesDebbie Kem / Joan Donoghue vs Lorrie Roberts / Catherine Stokes3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesFrances Bouffard / Carolyn Beckham vs Rachael Day / Sabra Szczyglowski4-6, 1-6
2022-04-23vs Serve and SipWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoan Donoghue / Debbie Kem vs Christina Mellors / Lexi Osleger6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Hanback / Frances Bouffard vs Carter Corbin / Cary Scharf7-5, 6-2
2022-04-09vs TNT WomenLost 01
L#1 DoublesDebbie Kem / Elaine Brissette vs Rachael Day / Debbie Rhoades3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2022-04-02vs TNT WomenWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoan Donoghue / Debbie Kem vs Rachael Day / Tracey Nankivel6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Joan Donoghue
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Debbie Kem
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Lisa Palmer
published
3.06
Frances Bouffard
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.96
Carolyn Beckham
published 3.5
2.85
Susan Button
published
2.81
Tara Ford
published
2.74
Jamie Mcneill
published 3
Kathryn Davis
published
Teresa Stone
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Donoghue + Debbie Kem1126955% games−2.5% vs expected
Debbie Kem + Frances Bouffard9650% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Joan Donoghue
200W–125L career · 3 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Debbie Kem
233W–165L career · 5 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
Lisa Palmer
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Frances Bouffard
79W–103L career · 4 lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Carolyn Beckham
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.96
Susan Button
12W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
Tara Ford
20W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Jamie Mcneill
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Kathryn Davis
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Jane Wooldridge
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Teresa Stone
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.