Teams

A4 WOCC Haas

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-03vs A5 KRA Smash Girls Green/TurnerWon 10
W#1 SinglesRebecca Hendrix vs Charlotte Shirey6-4, 6-1
2023-05-27vs A3 ACAC StephensWon 30
W#1 DoublesIngrid Hale / Tia Thomas vs Lara Hansen / Jeanette Kim6-0, 7-6
W#1 SinglesYancey Haas vs Kim Smith6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeather Drew / Darlene Moehling vs Valerie Stephens / Diane Linderman6-0, 6-3
2023-05-20vs A1 Westwood WestWon 21
W#1 DoublesYancey Haas / Ingrid Hale vs Cynthia Oakey / Kacie Painter6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesRebecca Hendrix vs Margaret Burke3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Tia Thomas vs Sarah Demm / Elizabeth West7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRebecca Hendrix / Stacy Curtis vs Robbin Coleman / Carolyn Hawley6-4, 6-1
2023-05-06vs A6 Belmont SherdelWon 20
W#1 DoublesHeather Drew / Darlene Moehling vs Susanne Nazur / Shivani Jain6-4, 5-5
W#1 SinglesRebecca Hendrix vs Lauren Maguire6-0, 6-2
2023-04-22vs A2 Dominion Sweeney/ WagnerWon 20
W#1 DoublesHeather Drew / Darlene Moehling vs Heidi Collier / Michele Limoges6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesYancey Haas vs Susan Long6-2, 6-3
2023-04-15vs A9 Three Chopt Pearson BreakersWon 20
W#1 DoublesIngrid Hale / Squig Moore vs Angie Pearson / Cam Nguyen7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesYancey Haas vs Lucy Timmins6-0, 6-0
2023-04-02vs A7 RMC SweeneyWon 30
W#1 DoublesIngrid Hale / Squig Moore vs Sania Marcoccia / Michelle Mouer6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesRebecca Hendrix vs Melanie Eccard4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesYancey Haas / Tia Thomas vs Cynthia Muncy / Catherine Sweeney6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Darlene Moehling
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.75
Yancey Haas
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.69
Rebecca Hendrix
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.55
Ingrid Hale
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.46
Tia Thomas
published
3.43
Mansi Shah
published
3.42
Heather Drew
published
3.39
Cheri Stringer
published 3.5
3.37
Laura Vetter
published
3.15
Kelly Gregory
published
3.10
Meredith Miles
published
2.83
Stacy Curtis
published
Squig Moore
published
Susan Mangin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Vetter + Heather Drew2356% games−0.3% vs expected
Ingrid Hale + Yancey Haas9654% gamesnot enough data
Yancey Haas + Darlene Moehling5157% gamesnot enough data
Meredith Miles + Kelly Gregory123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darlene Moehling
110W–77L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Yancey Haas
166W–100L career · 7 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.75
Rebecca Hendrix
49W–21L career · 5 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Ingrid Hale
88W–60L career · 7 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.55
Tia Thomas
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
3.46
Mansi Shah
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.43
Heather Drew
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Cheri Stringer
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
Laura Vetter
20W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
Kelly Gregory
13W–15L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
Meredith Miles
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
Stacy Curtis
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Squig Moore
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Mangin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.