Teams

WNC J Hudgens (HRC)

Combo 40 & Over USTA WNC 2023 · WNC Combo 40 & over 7.5 women - monday

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for WNC Combo 40 & over 7.5 women - monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Beth MacDonald
published 4
3.54
Jennifer Hudgens
published
3.43
Heidi Zehr
published
3.42
Sharlyn Aamodt
published
3.38
Linda Nash
published
3.35
TLynn Gilpin
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.33
Laurie Guinn
published
3.31
Angela Hare
published 3.5
3.15
Kenna Armstrong
published
3.11
Brenda Bowie
published 3.5
2.89
Sheri Sparks
published
Tracy McKenna
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Nash + TLynn Gilpin9071% games+12.7% vs expected
Jennifer Hudgens + TLynn Gilpin2456% games+10.8% vs expected
Jennifer Hudgens + Brenda Bowie3251% games+7.8% vs expected
Heidi Zehr + Beth MacDonald2341% gamesnot enough data
Kenna Armstrong + Heidi Zehr224 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Hudgens + Beth MacDonald213 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Guinn + Angela Hare213 matchesnot enough data
TLynn Gilpin + Beth MacDonald213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth MacDonald
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Jennifer Hudgens
23W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.54
Heidi Zehr
10W–23L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.43
Sharlyn Aamodt
19W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
Linda Nash
15W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
TLynn Gilpin
286W–221L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
Laurie Guinn
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Angela Hare
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Kenna Armstrong
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Brenda Bowie
9W–22L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
Sheri Sparks
13W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
Tracy McKenna
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.