Teams

UPTA40/Pelino/Southside

2023 UPTA Combo 40 & Over - SC · 40+ Combo Women - 6.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.39 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40+ Combo Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Jackie Cooper
published 4
3.68
3.66
Janet Matricciani
published
3.59
Maria Gulli
published
3.42
Jennifer Tuttle
published
3.40
Amanda Powell
published 3.5
3.37
Danielle Henderson
published 3.5
3.33
Monika Franz
published
3.32
Charity Richards
published 3.5
3.26
Mona Cooper
published
2.80
Traci Gmitro
published
2.79
Gina Pelino
published 3
2.67
Cara Morris
published 3
2.60
2.59
Katy Davidson
published
2.58
Madina Cauthen
published
2.52
Gloria Bleasdale
published 3
Joan Smith
published
Katie Burns
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mona Cooper + Danielle Henderson3644% games−5.4% vs expected
Mona Cooper + Amanda Powell044 matchesnot enough data
Janet Matricciani + Christina Burnette134 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Henderson + Amanda Powell224 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Henderson + Monika Franz224 matchesnot enough data
Katy Davidson + Gloria Bleasdale123 matchesnot enough data
Gina Pelino + Mona Cooper033 matchesnot enough data
Katie Burns + Amanda Powell033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jackie Cooper
28W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Christina Burnette
38W–21L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Janet Matricciani
27W–34L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.66
Maria Gulli
64W–26L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
Jennifer Tuttle
31W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Amanda Powell
22W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Danielle Henderson
31W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.37
Monika Franz
34W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Charity Richards
2W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Mona Cooper
34W–45L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
Traci Gmitro
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Gina Pelino
38W–52L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Cara Morris
15W–27L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Elizabeth Faulkner
15W–30L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
Katy Davidson
8W–20L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.59
Madina Cauthen
34W–42L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Gloria Bleasdale
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
2.52
Joan Smith
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katie Burns
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.