Teams

TCSP-LXX & Beyond-Garcia

2022 Adult 70 & Over · Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-24vs HBSQ-AdeeLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlan Keefe / Michael Evans vs Rick Downey / Ron Fredrickson2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJoseph Garcia / David Holley vs Joe Leinonen / Ray Poletti2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-08-12vs RBW-LocknerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoseph Garcia / Alan Keefe vs Chuck Burns / Jerry Lilly3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Holley / Stephen Kirk vs George Weiss / Fred Aasheim6-2, 6-3
2022-08-04vs BETC-ThompsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Holley / Alan Keefe vs Martin Chang / Patrick Mason4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMike Hascall / Regis Thevenet vs Stuart Thompson / Jerry Pfieffer0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesStephen Kirk / Michael Evans vs Yee Liaw / Michael Sellars4-6, 1-6
2022-07-22vs CAC/SL-COORS-CorcoranSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichael Evans / Mike Hascall vs John Drake / Daniel Martin6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJoseph Garcia / Alan Keefe vs Neil Johnson / Carl Nielsen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-07-15vs AYTC (OUTDOORS)-Aces-R-Fun-EdwardsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoseph Garcia / Michael Evans vs Alexander Friedrich / Stevan Phillips1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Holley / Mike Hascall vs Glen Iwasaki / Jim Kearney6-2, 6-1
2022-06-24vs RBW-Old Guys-DoddLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Holley / Mike Hascall vs Garold Jang / David Hendricks0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJay Naylor / Michael Evans vs Terry Dodd / Phil Bradbury0-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RBW-Old Guys-Dodd6014411126
2HBSQ-Adee5114410110
3BETC-Thompson4212615143
4AYTC (OUTDOORS)-Aces-R-Fun-Edwards3381022169
5CAC/SL-COORS-Corcoran1571123159
6TCSP-LXX & Beyond-Garcia1541428183
7RBW-Lockner1541428187

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Holley
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Michael Evans
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.64
Alan Keefe
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
CHRIS HAUSSMANN
published
Jay Naylor
published
Joseph Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Mark Trevor Smith
published
Mike Hascall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Regis Thevenet
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Holley + Michael Evans134 matchesnot enough data
Mike Hascall + David Holley213 matchesnot enough data
David Holley + Joseph Garcia213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
David Holley
10W–15L career · type S · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Michael Evans
7W–22L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Alan Keefe
32W–42L career · 4 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
CHRIS HAUSSMANN
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jay Naylor
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Garcia
5W–20L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Trevor Smith
13W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mike Hascall
5W–29L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Regis Thevenet
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.