Teams

Re.Procter55M

2023 Cap 55 & Over Mixed · 8.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-19vs Te.McKee55MWon 10
W#2 DoublesCatherine Brawner / Thomas Stieber vs Patrick Wood / Juli Korsnack7-6, 6-4
2023-07-18vs St.Rabby55MWon 10
W#2 DoublesRebecca Procter / Michael Marchi vs Kathleen Tsibulsky / Ray Goldberg6-2, 6-1
2023-07-12vs Je.Monaghen55MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSusan Doninger Greer / Robert Kent vs Kathryn Beth Beam / Philip Gugliotta6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRebecca Procter / Michael Marchi vs Christopher Bricker / Andrea McCartney6-2, 6-0
2023-06-28vs Je.Chaffin55MWon 20
W#2 DoublesRebecca Procter / Michael Hamlett vs Gary Caiola / Lee Berrios-Smothers6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Brawner / Alan Crews vs Sandra Rhoades / Jeff Chaffin6-3, 6-1
2023-06-14vs Bi.Francis55MWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Doninger Greer / Robert Kent vs Mary Cockrill / David Damare4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-06-07vs Lo.Hatlen55MLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Brawner / Michael Hamlett vs Lisa Ihly / Roger Hatlen6-7, 3-6
2023-05-31vs Te.McKee55MLost 02
L#1 DoublesRebecca Procter / Alan Crews vs Annette Page / John Gearing1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Brawner / Michael Marchi vs John van Campen / Juli Korsnack2-6, 6-7
2023-05-24vs Je.Monaghen55MLost 02
L#1 DoublesCatherine Brawner / Michael Hamlett vs Michael Shaw / Jennifer Bricker3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Procter / Alan Crews vs Kathryn Beth Beam / Jeffrey Monaghen5-7, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Michael Hamlett
published
3.80
Robert Kent
published
3.73
Thomas Stieber
published
3.72
Michael Marchi
published
3.71
Alan Crews
published 4
3.66
Catherine Brawner
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.63
Jean Harrold
published
3.59
Edward Farley
published
3.54
Lori Mayes
published
3.46
Rebecca Procter
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.37
Susan Doninger Greer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Hamlett
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.87
Robert Kent
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.80
Thomas Stieber
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Michael Marchi
15W–3L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Alan Crews
18W–12L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Catherine Brawner
111W–93L career · 5 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
Jean Harrold
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.63
Edward Farley
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
Lori Mayes
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Rebecca Procter
185W–147L career · 5 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.46
4
Susan Doninger Greer
97W–125L career · 2 lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
3.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.