Teams

GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Farrah)(NMSU)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2024 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Cindy Blackman
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.70
Cathey Jo Alberson
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.59
Eunsook Yoo
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Amelia Pilcher
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.33
Chantal Spilliaert
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Cynthia Pelak
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.19
Candace Giummo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Debbie Kinkel
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Janet Treon
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Linda Rowse
usually #1 Doubles 77%, also #2 Doubles 12% · published
Maggie Follin
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Radel Farrah
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Sandy Lang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Virginia Hernandez
usually #3 Doubles 31%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Xanthe Phillips
usually #1 Singles 45%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eunsook Yoo + Radel Farrah5167% games+6.6% vs expected
Virginia Hernandez + Xanthe Phillips13956% games+5.3% vs expected
Candace Giummo + Chantal Spilliaert2739% games−1.1% vs expected
Cathey Jo Alberson + Radel Farrah9655% gamesnot enough data
Maggie Follin + Chantal Spilliaert6751% gamesnot enough data
Candace Giummo + Cynthia Pelak8455% gamesnot enough data
Amelia Pilcher + Janet Treon1744% gamesnot enough data
Amelia Pilcher + Cindy Blackman4448% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindy Blackman
45W–47L career · 15 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Cathey Jo Alberson
45W–26L career · 24 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.70
4
Eunsook Yoo
71W–22L career · 9 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Amelia Pilcher
28W–38L career · 10 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Chantal Spilliaert
24W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Cynthia Pelak
15W–11L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Candace Giummo
14W–31L career · 8 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.19
3.5
Debbie Kinkel
20W–30L career · type A · 7 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.11
Janet Treon
33W–34L career · 20 lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Rowse
41W–17L career · 17 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maggie Follin
42W–32L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Radel Farrah
59W–33L career · 14 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandy Lang
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Virginia Hernandez
82W–69L career · 16 lines in 2024
not enough data
Xanthe Phillips
68W–34L career · 19 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.