Teams

Wycota

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER · Mens 4.5 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / WYOMING

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-27vs Casper CrewWon 10
W#2 DoublesJesse Chavez / Dylan Hatanelas vs Jeff Cutts / Larry Graham6-3, 6-0
2025-04-26vs Casper CrewWon 10
W#2 SinglesThomas Carson vs Robert Litke6-1, 6-2
2025-04-26vs Casper CrewSplit 11
L#1 SinglesThomas Carson vs Eric Nokes3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJesse Chavez / Dylan Hatanelas vs Robert Ingram / Jeff Cutts6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Mens 4.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wycota301051197

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.30 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Dylan Hatanelas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.43
Ian Powers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.42
Wil Hotz
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.41
Thomas Carson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.31
Shawn Farnell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.27
Reeves Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.16
Jesse Chavez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
Austin Stege
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Bryce Melcher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Reeves Anderson + Ian Powers12459% games+6.8% vs expected
Dylan Hatanelas + Ian Powers11261% games+5.4% vs expected
Reeves Anderson + Shawn Farnell3251% games−4.6% vs expected
Austin Stege + Bryce Melcher3845% games−6.6% vs expected
Jesse Chavez + Shawn Farnell224 matchesnot enough data
Jesse Chavez + Dylan Hatanelas404 matchesnot enough data
Wil Hotz + Ian Powers224 matchesnot enough data
Reeves Anderson + Thomas Carson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dylan Hatanelas
24W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
4.46
4.5
Ian Powers
59W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
4.43
4.5
Wil Hotz
32W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
4.42
Thomas Carson
32W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
4.41
4.5
Shawn Farnell
78W–76L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Reeves Anderson
92W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.27
Jesse Chavez
40W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Austin Stege
41W–51L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Bryce Melcher
18W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.