Teams

PC-Serve-ivors

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 WOMEN

13 players · average NTRP 2.93 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-19vs EW-PFC-SteinerLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnne Neuberger / Christine Cattell vs Jenny Bryant / Piper Peterson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCandee Foss / Theresa Koehler vs Michelle Burgess / Shirlee Steiner6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTammy Deery / Jennilyn Evans vs Sandee Andrews / Marie Lambert4-6, 5-7
2025-10-18vs CBRC-Tri-Cities FusionLost 03
L#1 DoublesDiane Haney / Laura Kast vs Xia Suter / Sheila Coles2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Neuberger / Tammy Deery vs Karin Kontogianis / Carol Curry6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTheresa Koehler / Kathy Walker vs Lory Allen / Ord McConaghy4-6, 6-7
2025-10-18vs WRAC-Bowen-LorrainWon 21
W#1 DoublesKeri Marino / Candee Foss vs Pamela Farley / MaryLynn Dodd6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAngie Stilson / Karen Drury vs Heidi Rudy / Cheryl Stransky2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Walker / Laura Kast vs Cindy Bowen-Lorrain / Emily Lesky6-3, 6-4
2025-10-17vs YTC-Miller TimeWon 21
L#1 DoublesKeri Marino / Jennilyn Evans vs Jill Christianson / Janet Warner4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCandee Foss / Theresa Koehler vs Lisa Watkins / Megan Tweedy6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAngie Stilson / Karen Drury vs Joyce Flyckt / Judi Harris6-4, 6-2
2025-10-17vs SRC-ChessarWon 30
W#1 DoublesTammy Deery / Diane Haney vs Mayrene Bickmore / Sharon Pataky5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKeri Marino / Jennilyn Evans vs Sheri Shaw / Kimberly Winter6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChristine Cattell / Anne Neuberger vs Suzanne Griffin-Lawson / Susan Boinski6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Anne Neuberger
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Jennilyn Evans
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Laura Kast
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Candee Foss
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.79
Keri Marino
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Christine Cattell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Theresa Koehler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Tammy Deery
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.53
Diane Haney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.53
Patty Aoyama
published
2.49
Angie Stilson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Karen Drury
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kathy Walker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keri Marino + Jennilyn Evans4260% gamesnot enough data
Candee Foss + Keri Marino314 matchesnot enough data
Christine Cattell + Angie Stilson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anne Neuberger
55W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
Jennilyn Evans
16W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
Laura Kast
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Candee Foss
27W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Keri Marino
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Christine Cattell
68W–95L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Theresa Koehler
22W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
3
Tammy Deery
21W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
2.5
Diane Haney
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%42%58%
2.53
Patty Aoyama
34W–42L career · no lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.53
3
Angie Stilson
3W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49
Karen Drury
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Walker
16W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.