← Teams

VTC-Chiu

2024 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Diana Almy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.56
Carol Chiu
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.56
Pamela Buckley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.52
Joanne Reardon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.44
Lori D'Antonio
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.42
Karen Pickering
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.40
Cindy Rushall
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.09
Lisa Provost
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Results10 ties
2023-12-02Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesCindy Rushall / Lori D'Antonio vs Lynn Sosa / Erica Tsuruta7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJulie Carmena / Karen Pickering vs Tamara Witcosky / Judi Babcock3-2
2023-11-18Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesTami Oglesby / Karen Pickering vs Linda Graham / Paula Watt6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJoanne Reardon / Lisa Provost vs Teresa Jackson / Anita Havemann6-4, 6-1
2023-11-04Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesTami Oglesby / Karen Pickering vs Crystal Bryant / Cathryn Hansen6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLori D'Antonio / Lisa Provost vs Kari Martin / Donna Roisom6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCarol Chiu / Tina Clancy vs Barbara Seatter / Elda Nelson6-1, 6-1
2023-11-03Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesTami Oglesby / Karen Pickering vs Lisa Lyon / Jan Rothert6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLori D'Antonio / Tina Clancy vs Amy Alpern / Jana Corder2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCindy Rushall / Carol Chiu vs Cathy Porter / Mary Elliott7-5, 6-1
2023-10-28Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesTami Oglesby / Karen Pickering vs Linda Lovett / Kim Stevens6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPamela Buckley / Lori D'Antonio vs Dana McKillop / Jean Herbst6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCindy Rushall / Carol Chiu vs Pam Saftler / Susie Jansky7-5, 6-2
2023-10-22Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesPamela Buckley / Joanne Reardon vs Joelle Lewis / Julie Brown6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCindy Rushall / Carol Chiu vs Joan Major / Elizabeth Domagalski1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-10-15Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesPamela Buckley / Carol Chiu vs Carol Briggs / Robby Lafleur3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-10-13Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesPamela Buckley / Tina Clancy vs Jill Derry / Nenette Olson6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Chiu / Cindy Rushall vs Sue Edmonds / Yumiko Pike6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTami Oglesby / Karen Pickering vs Annie Sumpter / Cheryl Hopkins6-2, 6-2
2023-10-10Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesTina Clancy / Cindy Rushall vs Karen Dellinger / Flor Harrigan6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPamela Buckley / Laura Webb vs Angie Lee / Bo Yu7-6, 6-3
2023-10-08Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesDiana Almy / Karen Pickering vs Suzanne Boss / Kathleen Murrin4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Diana Almy
50W–38L career
not enough data
—
4
Carol Chiu
87W–73L career
19%81%0%
3.56
4
Pamela Buckley
56W–37L career
22%78%0%
3.56
4
Joanne Reardon
32W–33L career · type A
35%65%0%
3.52
3.5
Lori D'Antonio
77W–85L career
0%81%18%
3.44
3.5
Karen Pickering
156W–123L career
0%95%5%
3.42
4
Cindy Rushall
100W–170L career
64%36%0%
3.40
3.5
Lisa Provost
37W–120L career
19%81%0%
3.09

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.