Teams

Raintree Boomers - Stahling 7.0

2025 Richmond Adult 65 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 65 & Over Weekday 7.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-06vs MTC Gilfillan 7.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Harmon / Kelly Smith vs Nancy Reynolds / Carol Beth Cook6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKathryn Darling / Susan Evans vs Barbara Patterson / Diana Duddy6-2, 7-6
2025-05-16vs Westwood Smith 7.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesLorraine McGehee / Lisa Harmon vs Dianne Dementi / Margaret Kohler6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMona Stahling / Kelly Smith vs Lynda Smith / Ginger Evans6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBarbara Portanova / Kathryn Darling vs Pamela Jester / Claudia Williams6-1, 6-4
2025-05-02vs MTC Gilfillan 7.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Moncure / Lisa Harmon vs Maureen McGrath / Suzanne Johnson4-6, 4-6
2025-04-25vs RCC Ames 7.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Harmon / Carolyn Moncure vs Linda Battle / Catherine Fallin6-3, 7-5
2025-04-24vs Westwood Smith 7.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSusan Evans / Lisa Harmon vs Lynda Smith / Barbara Copley6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMona Stahling / Barbara Portanova vs Shirley Watkins / Margaret Kohler6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDonna Moody / Kathryn Darling vs Claudia Williams / Pamela Jester4-6, 5-7
2025-04-18vs ACAC Larue 7.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesBarbara Portanova / Carolyn Moncure vs Maureen Sisti / Linda Wood6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 65 & Over Weekday 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Lisa Harmon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Lorraine McGehee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Carolyn Moncure
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Karen Solana
published
3.09
Barbara Portanova
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Mona Stahling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Donna Moody
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kathryn Darling
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sally Thomasson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Harmon + Lorraine McGehee404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Harmon
16W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Lorraine McGehee
14W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Carolyn Moncure
43W–66L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Karen Solana
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Barbara Portanova
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
Mona Stahling
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.03
Donna Moody
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
Kathryn Darling
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sally Thomasson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.