Teams

7.0 Qualifying Team

2026 USTA Adult 55 & Over · Men 7.0- 55 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-06-27vs Peak 55+ MontanaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSteven Schwartz / Richard Schaub vs Troy Bean / Ray Nickless6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRoss Tillman / Britt Olander vs Mark Mohorcich / Bruce Hazeltine5-7, 4-6
2026-06-27vs Peak 55+ MontanaLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrian Clifton / Keith Nelson vs Greg Trangmoe / Matt Munding4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDan Wahle / Britt Olander vs Kelly Crisp / Layne Rolston2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSteven Schwartz / Richard Schaub vs Troy Bean / Ray Nickless4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-25vs Peak 55+ MontanaLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrian Clifton / Keith Nelson vs Greg Trangmoe / Matt Munding6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDan Wahle / Britt Olander vs Kelly Crisp / Layne Rolston5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRoss Tillman / Richard Schaub vs Mark Mohorcich / Bruce Hazeltine6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.0- 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bill Wilcox
published 3.5
Brian Clifton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Britt Olander
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Dan Wahle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jerry Fletcher
published
Keith Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Schaub
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ross Tillman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Steven Schwartz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Schwartz + Bill Wilcox3448% gamesnot enough data
Steven Schwartz + Jerry Fletcher1543% gamesnot enough data
Richard Schaub + Ross Tillman4156% gamesnot enough data
Jerry Fletcher + Ross Tillman044 matchesnot enough data
Steven Schwartz + Dan Wahle123 matchesnot enough data
Bill Wilcox + Jerry Fletcher123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bill Wilcox
16W–18L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Brian Clifton
17W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Britt Olander
1W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Dan Wahle
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
Jerry Fletcher
6W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Keith Nelson
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Schaub
15W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ross Tillman
17W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steven Schwartz
14W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.