Teams

Potts/18/5.5/CWN/CP

2025 NO Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 5.5 NO (18&O) Women Night

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-23vs Darden/Pottharst/18/5.5/CWN/CPLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Mcreynolds / Julie Norman vs Gina Mire / Natalie Pottharst1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBrandelyn Rauch / Kristi Joseph vs Nelly Toscano / Jacqueline Carey6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Smith / Megan Manning vs Dana Broussard Labat / Shawn Marie Rutland0-6, 0-6
2025-09-16vs Swan/18/5.5/CWN/CPLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristi Joseph / Sarah Mcreynolds vs Caroline Brown / Kelly Scairono1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Smith / Adair Weekley vs Rebecca Callaway / Holly Garrity0-6, 3-6
2025-09-10vs Williamson/18/5.5/NOCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesCecelia Coon / Catherine Smith vs Lydia Butler / Robin Williamson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrandelyn Rauch / Kristi Joseph vs Emily Foster / Sarah Stokes2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Norman / Laura Potts vs Lucy Browne / Melyne Holmes6-7, 5-7
2025-09-02vs Slaton-Devall/18/5.5/CWN/CPLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaura Potts / Julie Norman vs Eileen Devall / Enid Fahrenholt5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKristi Joseph / Megan Manning vs Erin Saucier / Laura Thomas2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Smith / Adair Weekley vs Merideth Eldridge / Margaret Cheramie6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2025-08-27vs Keller/Kiefer/18/5.5/CWN/CapsLost 12
L#1 DoublesClaire Zeringue / Kristi Joseph vs Tracey Duplantis / Skylar Grass4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Potts / Catherine Smith vs Alison Kiefer / Cynthia Cimino1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Mcreynolds / Julie Norman vs Neyda Leslie / Patricia Andrews Smith7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2025-08-18vs PerinoForster/18/5.5/CWN/CPLost 12
L#1 DoublesCecelia Coon / Claire Zeringue vs Lacey Charvet / Alex Veazey6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLibby Bourgeois / Laura Potts vs Judy Kang / Niquette Kearney7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSarah Mcreynolds / Catherine Smith vs Kelly Ural / Kristen Klamer1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 5.5 NO (18&O) Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Darden/Pottharst/18/5.5/CWN/CP60180161
2PerinoForster/18/5.5/CWN/CP60171265
3Powers/18/5.5/CWN/CP5114413117
4Williamson/18/5.5/NOCC5112613132
5Berniard/18/5.5/CWN/CP3310819146
6Swan/18/5.5/CWN/CP339920143
7Lewis/18/5.5/CWN/XU339920154
8Ackerman/18/5.5/CWN/CP3381023180
9Brown/Held/18/5.5/CWN/CP2471124172
10Slaton-Devall/18/5.5/CWN/CP1551327183
11Keller/Kiefer/18/5.5/CWN/Caps1551327185
12Muscenti/18/5.5/CWN/CP1521633205
13Potts/18/5.5/CWN/CP0611735215

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Sarah Mcreynolds
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Libby Bourgeois
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Adair Weekley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Brandelyn Rauch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Cecelia Coon
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.45
Claire Zeringue
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.28
Laura Potts
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Julie Norman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kristi Joseph
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Megan Manning
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claire Zeringue + Libby Bourgeois2342% games−0.8% vs expected
Brandelyn Rauch + Kristi Joseph3741% games−11.3% vs expected
Cecelia Coon + Laura Potts044 matchesnot enough data
Julie Norman + Laura Potts134 matchesnot enough data
Claire Zeringue + Laura Potts033 matchesnot enough data
Libby Bourgeois + Laura Potts123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Mcreynolds
4W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
Libby Bourgeois
10W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Adair Weekley
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Brandelyn Rauch
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cecelia Coon
6W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Claire Zeringue
2W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.45
Laura Potts
4W–26L career · 9 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.28
Julie Norman
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristi Joseph
4W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Megan Manning
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.