Teams

Skalski Sugar and Spice & Minnesota Nice RAC

2026 USTA League Tennis Mixed 18 & Over Winter-RO · 6.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-01vs Hallemeier Mixed Shots RACWon 30
W#1 DoublesChloe Corey / Randall Brock vs Ian Roth / Caitlin Roth6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Duchateau / Lei Zhao vs Connie Chang / James Wilking6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKevin Hileman / Leslie Clark vs Camila Hallemeier / Christopher Hallemeier6-2, 6-2
2026-02-22vs Williams Ball Hogs RACWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaurice Westerhouse / Becky Westerhouse vs Mark Williams / Mashele Huschka6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesParamita Majumder / Shounak Majumder vs Eyesha Younus / Amjith Khader7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichelle Duchateau / Kevin Cunningham vs Marcella Venettozzi / Jonathan Carr6-1, 6-3
2026-02-15vs McCarthy Minnesota Slice RTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesRandall Brock / Leslie Clark vs Marine Murphree / Vinod Kumar Gupta6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBecky Westerhouse / Maurice Westerhouse vs Kathleen McCarthy / Michael Moss6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesShounak Majumder / Paramita Majumder vs Rachel Bulbulian / Brian Gorman6-1, 6-1
2026-02-01vs Reeve Drop Shots! Part Deuce RTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesChloe Corey / Randall Brock vs Hilary DuBrock / Jordan Kautz6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLynne Peterson / Gregory Peterson vs Anna Strand / John Unterholzner5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJulia Skalski / Kevin Hileman vs Julia Routman / Patrick Wieneke6-4, 6-4
2026-01-25vs Balcom Tundratown Topspin RTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesBecky Westerhouse / Maurice Westerhouse vs Jessica Balcom / Jonghoon Choi6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChloe Corey / Randall Brock vs SHUPEI LIU / Yu Shi7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLeslie Clark / Kevin Hileman vs Jane Rosenman / Jeffrey Becker2-6, 4-6
2026-01-11vs Munden Dare Doubles United RTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesRandall Brock / Julia Skalski vs Qi Tan / Melissa Coleman6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLeslie Clark / Lei Zhao vs Muhammad Shah / Melanie Lyden6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesParamita Majumder / Kevin Cunningham vs Daiki Hara / Amy Czaplewski6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 6.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Munden Dare Doubles United RTC601628120
2Balcom Tundratown Topspin RTC5112615131
3Skalski Sugar and Spice & Minnesota Nice RAC3312612123
4Reeve Drop Shots! Part Deuce RTC3311716129
5McCarthy Minnesota Slice RTC3381021159
6Williams Ball Hogs RAC1541428188
7Hallemeier Mixed Shots RAC0601836218

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Maurice Westerhouse
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.17
Shounak Majumder
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.05
Chloe Corey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.98
Randall Brock
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.82
Michelle Duchateau
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.80
Lei Zhao
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Lynne Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Paramita Majumder
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Gregory Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Kevin Hileman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Becky Westerhouse
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Julia Skalski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maurice Westerhouse + Becky Westerhouse5166% gamesnot enough data
Gregory Peterson + Lynne Peterson033 matchesnot enough data
Randall Brock + Chloe Corey213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maurice Westerhouse
15W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Shounak Majumder
12W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
3
Chloe Corey
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
Randall Brock
3W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.98
Michelle Duchateau
20W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Lei Zhao
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
2.80
Lynne Peterson
14W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Paramita Majumder
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
2.62
Gregory Peterson
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Kevin Hileman
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
2.5
Becky Westerhouse
13W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%58%42%
2.47
Julia Skalski
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.