Teams

Toro - Net Success 55+ 6.0

2026 Howard Adult 55 & Over · Howard Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-06-11vs McKeon - DefendersWon 21
W#1 DoublesWilliam Custer / Ed Fletcher vs Michael Altman / Juan Rivas6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDonald Koch / Jose Toro vs Brian Sadur / Richard McKeon3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJaspreet Singh / Fred Shaw vs William Trimble / Alan Bruzee6-2, 6-3
2026-06-07vs Wade - Retired AssetsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEd Fletcher / Abraham Hollander vs David Fontaine / John Ricks4-6, 4-4
W#2 DoublesJose Toro / Donald Koch vs Frank Miles / Chetram Nanan6-1, 6-2
2026-06-03vs McKeon - DefendersLost 12
W#1 DoublesWilliam Custer / Ed Fletcher vs Mark Greenlee / Jim Hannan6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesBill Keating / Jose Toro vs Joseph Jacangelo / Kevin Ro1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDonald Koch / Fred Shaw vs Michael Altman / Brian Sadur1-6, 2-6
2026-05-27vs Wade - Retired AssetsWon 21
W#1 DoublesWilliam Custer / Ed Fletcher vs Mark Rossi / Chris Wertman4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJose Toro / Abraham Hollander vs John Ricks / Chetram Nanan6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRaymond Lyons / Jaspreet Singh vs Mark Russell / John Wade6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2026-05-26vs McKeon - DefendersLost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Custer / Ed Fletcher vs Joseph Jacangelo / Kevin Ro0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDonald Koch / Abraham Hollander vs Brian Sadur / Richard McKeon4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJaspreet Singh / Raymond Lyons vs William Trimble / Alan Bruzee6-3, 6-5
2026-05-17vs Wade - Retired AssetsLost 12
L#1 DoublesJose Toro / William Custer vs Michael Litzau / John Ricks3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDonald Koch / Abraham Hollander vs David Fontaine / Mark Rossi2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesEd Fletcher / Jaspreet Singh vs Chetram Nanan / Chris Wertman4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-05-11vs McKeon - DefendersLost 12
L#1 DoublesFred Shaw / Raymond Lyons vs Mike Silberglitt / Mark Greenlee0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesWilliam Custer / Ed Fletcher vs Juan Rivas / Miguel Mendoza6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJose Toro / Bill Keating vs Dave Horvath / Richard McKeon5-7, 3-3
2026-05-03vs Wade - Retired AssetsLost 12
W#1 DoublesEd Fletcher / William Custer vs John Ricks / John Wade6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBill Keating / Donald Koch vs Daniel Balkin / Chetram Nanan6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRaymond Lyons / Fred Shaw vs Michael Litzau / Mark Russell0-6, 0-6
2026-04-26vs McKeon - DefendersLost 03
L#1 DoublesBill Keating / Celso Gutierrez vs Mike Silberglitt / Kevin Ro2-5
L#2 DoublesEd Fletcher / William Custer vs Majed Hamawy / David Glasgow0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDonald Koch / Raymond Lyons vs Richard McKeon / Jim Hannan3-6, 2-6
2026-04-12vs Wade - Retired AssetsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBill Keating / William Custer vs Michael Litzau / John Ricks3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAbraham Hollander / Donald Koch vs David Fontaine / Mark Rossi7-6, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Howard Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Toro - Net Success 55+ 6.028111940285

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
William Custer
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.93
Bill Keating
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.86
Jose Toro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.76
Ed Fletcher
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
2.64
Abraham Hollander
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.54
Celso Gutierrez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.37
Raymond Lyons
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Donald Koch
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Fred Shaw
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Custer + Ed Fletcher5256% games+13.0% vs expected
Donald Koch + Abraham Hollander123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
William Custer
46W–47L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Bill Keating
26W–45L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Jose Toro
30W–67L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
Ed Fletcher
8W–11L career · 9 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Abraham Hollander
24W–68L career · 5 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Celso Gutierrez
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54
Raymond Lyons
21W–43L career · 5 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.37
Donald Koch
3W–13L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Fred Shaw
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.