Teams

SNarayan-CHTC

2025 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 8.5 Men Evening

15 players · average NTRP 4.31 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesPraveen Krishnamurthy / Santha Perian vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-05vs JByrd40-DURWon 10
W#2 DoublesJackson Naftel / Stewart Bible vs Ben Cooke / Ryan Kessler6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2025-09-25vs MPiland-HRWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlexis Maklakoff / Jackson Naftel vs Eric Labow / Jeffrey Clough3-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDan Clemson / Michael Meltsner vs Daniel Hill / Matt Piland6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-08-28vs JByrd40-DURWon 10
W#2 DoublesJackson Naftel / Sudhanshu Handa vs Patrick Shields / Seunghyun Hwang6-2, 6-4
2025-08-24vs JByrd40-DURWon 10
W#1 DoublesStewart Bible / Jackson Naftel vs Manuel Mariategui Vargas / Eric Roller7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 8.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Sravan Narayan
published
4.19
Gabriel Dichter
published
4.18
Jackson Naftel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.16
Alexis Maklakoff
published 4.5
4.13
Praveen Krishnamurthy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Zachary Osofsky
published
4.11
Stewart Bible
published
4.10
David Hamrin
published 4.5
4.02
Dan Clemson
published 4.5
3.97
Santha Perian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.93
Sudhanshu Handa
published
3.92
Michael Meltsner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Chris Combs
published 4
Jason Moon
published
Scott Benson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Santha Perian + Praveen Krishnamurthy271158% games+5.8% vs expected
Sudhanshu Handa + Sravan Narayan5254% games−9.4% vs expected
Zachary Osofsky + Dan Clemson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sravan Narayan
20W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
Gabriel Dichter
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Jackson Naftel
66W–59L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Alexis Maklakoff
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Praveen Krishnamurthy
239W–127L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
4.13
Zachary Osofsky
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
4.12
Stewart Bible
15W–28L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
4.11
4.5
David Hamrin
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Dan Clemson
20W–10L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
4.02
4
Santha Perian
210W–108L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.97
Sudhanshu Handa
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.93
4
Michael Meltsner
58W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Chris Combs
23W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.87
Jason Moon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Benson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.