Teams

TU - Sandras

2023 Tuscaloosa USTA Combo Doubles - Weeknight 18&over · 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.43 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Melanie Higgins
published
3.67
April McKnight
published 4
3.60
Gayle Faught
published 4
3.30
Marina Williams
published
Allison Espey
published 3.5
3.05
Lynn Shaw
published
2.95
Carrie Fitts
published 3.5
2.94
Tara Ketchum
published
2.87
Susan Whitley
published
2.83
2.71
Cari Sandras
published 3
2.64
Amanda Arnold
published 3
Kelli Lovoy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

April McKnight + Melanie Higgins9153% games+7.8% vs expected
Gayle Faught + Melanie Higgins314 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Lee Almond + Marina Williams123 matchesnot enough data
April McKnight + Gayle Faught303 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Arnold + Tara Ketchum213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Higgins
71W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.81
4
April McKnight
38W–34L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.67
4
Gayle Faught
23W–13L career · no lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.60
Marina Williams
30W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Allison Espey
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lynn Shaw
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Carrie Fitts
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
2.95
Tara Ketchum
21W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
Susan Whitley
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
2.87
3
Cynthia Lee Almond
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Cari Sandras
27W–22L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Amanda Arnold
11W–30L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
2.64
Kelli Lovoy
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.