Teams

Wyoming/Stege/18Mixed9.0

2026 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER · MIXED - 9.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.60 / WYOMING

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-31vs Q TeamSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJesse Chavez / Christine Pelletier vs Ken Kawakami / Mitzi Johnson6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShawn Farnell / Andrea Wallace vs Scott Bolton / Jennifer Wiley4-6, 4-6
2026-05-31vs Q TeamSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElin Farnell / Wil Buchanan vs Ken Kawakami / Mitzi Johnson6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesShawn Farnell / Andrea Wallace vs Bryce Melcher / Amanda Repert6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-05-30vs Q TeamWon 20
W#1 DoublesAustin Stege / Kate Allison vs Bryce Melcher / Amanda Repert6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJesse Chavez / Andrea Wallace vs Ken Kawakami / Jennifer Wiley6-3, 6-1
2026-05-30vs Q TeamWon 20
W#1 DoublesAustin Stege / Christine Pelletier vs Bryce Melcher / Amanda Repert3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElin Farnell / Wil Buchanan vs Ken Kawakami / Mitzi Johnson6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · MIXED - 9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wyoming/Stege/18Mixed9.040102567
2Q Team0421021137

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.63
Elin Farnell
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.43
Andrea Wallace
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.31
Shawn Farnell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.18
Christine Pelletier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Jesse Chavez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.13
Austin Stege
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.07
Kate Allison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Wil Buchanan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elin Farnell + Shawn Farnell5651% games+6.1% vs expected
Shawn Farnell + Andrea Wallace1842% games−12.6% vs expected
Jesse Chavez + Christine Pelletier4253% gamesnot enough data
Elin Farnell + Wil Buchanan404 matchesnot enough data
Elin Farnell + Austin Stege123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Elin Farnell
50W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
4.63
4.5
Andrea Wallace
37W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
4.43
4.5
Shawn Farnell
78W–76L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Christine Pelletier
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
4.18
Jesse Chavez
40W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Austin Stege
41W–51L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
4.13
Kate Allison
24W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
30%70%<1%
4.07
Wil Buchanan
51W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.