Teams

Lakeland CC - Grieger/Evans

2025 Polk Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

17 players · average NTRP 2.94 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-20vs WHCC Mid Court Crisis - J. HymanLost 01
L#1 DoublesCourtney Larson / Sheryl Norman vs Kathy Borders / Jan Hyman3-6, 3-6
2025-05-13vs WH Spring Chicks - G. TardyWon 10
W#2 DoublesCourtney Larson / Sheryl Norman vs Laura Barben / Stephanie Barron6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesCourtney Larson / Sheryl Norman vs Catherine Mueller / Leisa Jordan6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLeah Grieger / Jaimi Miller vs Catherine Futch / Tracey Ritter6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGinny Houghton / Carey Campbell vs Sandy Smyth / Rosa Jean7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-04-29vs Polk/Marcewicz/40&Over3.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesJaimi Miller / Jane Phillips vs Rose Coulton / Courtney Philpot3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Shannon Miles
published
2.81
Jaimi Miller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Sheryl Norman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Elizabeth Paul
published 3
Carey Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Courtney Larson
published 3
2.72
Ginny Houghton
published 3
2.65
Brandy Lansford
published 3
2.64
Sandra Campisi
published
2.58
Jane Phillips
published
2.53
Rachel Hollis
published
2.50
Deanna Bayless
published 3
2.47
Hilary Crenshaw
published 3
2.45
Stacey Weeks
published
2.44
Leah Grieger
published
2.28
Jesse Larson
published
2.27
Donna Mcwilliams
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheryl Norman + Jaimi Miller4447% games−5.2% vs expected
Sheryl Norman + Elizabeth Paul033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Miles
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Jaimi Miller
37W–73L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Sheryl Norman
53W–65L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Elizabeth Paul
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Carey Campbell
15W–43L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Courtney Larson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Ginny Houghton
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Brandy Lansford
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
2.65
Sandra Campisi
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
2.64
Jane Phillips
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.58
Rachel Hollis
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
3
Deanna Bayless
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
3
Hilary Crenshaw
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47
Stacey Weeks
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%65%35%
2.45
Leah Grieger
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.44
Jesse Larson
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.28
2.5
Donna Mcwilliams
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.