Teams

08 August

2021 Williamsburg Refund Holding Area · Refund Holding Area

16 players · average NTRP 3.89 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Refund Holding Area have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Laura Earley
published 4.5
3.98
Kevin Dowdell
published
3.92
3.86
Candice Rininger
published 4
3.83
Brooke Teefey
published 4
3.72
Suzanne Stroup
published 4
3.58
3.48
Kimberly Pease
published
3.31
Jane Colgin
published 3.5
3.29
Mary Scott
published
Brenda Tyson
published 3.5
3.10
Dawn MacHonis
published 3.5
3.05
Jennifer Graham
published
Janice Whitaker
published
Jennifer Hanna
published
Robyn Wright
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Laura Earley
83W–52L career · no lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
4.08
Kevin Dowdell
12W–10L career · no lines in 2021
57%43%<1%
3.98
4
Jose Miguel Sacin
232W–97L career · no lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Candice Rininger
106W–90L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
3.86
4
Brooke Teefey
102W–45L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Suzanne Stroup
163W–101L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Julian Myers Benton
87W–85L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.58
Kimberly Pease
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
57%43%<1%
3.48
3.5
Jane Colgin
160W–148L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%8%
3.31
Mary Scott
18W–12L career · no lines in 2021
94%6%<1%
3.29
3.5
Brenda Tyson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Dawn MacHonis
5W–9L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.10
Jennifer Graham
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
3.05
Janice Whitaker
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jennifer Hanna
1W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Robyn Wright
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.