Teams

PRC YELLOW

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-19vs PCRK YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesChad Smith / Ryan McKeown vs Dirk Rasmussen / Jonah Staller6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEric Olsen-Dufour vs Ben Henry3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Hemann / Rick Wolfgang vs Adam Huff / Craig Claxton3-6, 6-7
2026-08-12vs CR-DC GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaul Hemann / Ryan McKeown vs David Winkler / Jonathan Muslow6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAlexander Linville / Eric Olsen-Dufour vs Brian Varner / G F Tanham7-5, 6-2
2026-08-05vs HRCA-S BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesMike Wilson / Ian Dyer vs Rohit Dass / Heyden Pue4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesPaul Hemann vs Marshall Nichols2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesChris Young / Ryan McKeown vs Sadras Senthilvel / Brandon Neff7-5, 6-0
2026-07-29vs SS-LT ORANGELost 01
L#1 DoublesChad Smith / Ian Dyer vs Reagan Harper / Randy Schumaker1-6, 1-6
2026-07-27vs PCRK REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesRyan McKeown / Chris Young vs Bruce Eldredge / William Mahaffy3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesScott Mannix / Paul Hemann vs Todd Campbell / Dean Schafer3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Alexander Linville
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Ryan McKeown
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.79
Ian Dyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Rick Wolfgang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Scott Mannix
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Paul Hemann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.36
Eric Olsen-Dufour
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Hemann + Eric Olsen-Dufour7261% gamesnot enough data
Paul Hemann + Ryan McKeown3350% gamesnot enough data
Ryan McKeown + Ian Dyer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alexander Linville
6W–13L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
Ryan McKeown
13W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
Ian Dyer
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
Rick Wolfgang
5W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
Scott Mannix
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Paul Hemann
45W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Eric Olsen-Dufour
151W–59L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.