Teams

LCTA55/Holder/PineForest

2022 USTA 55 & Over Spring · Women-3.0 - Friday

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-10-25vs LCTA55/Beach/MPRWon 20
W#1 DoublesTrudy Holder / Shirley Hunter-Welch vs Linda Veneman / Roberta Gilman6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChris Grund / Kathy Morgan vs Emily Ulrich / Penny Portman6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2024-10-18vs LCTA55/Helms/Dunes WestWon 30
W#1 DoublesTrudy Holder / Shirley Hunter-Welch vs Anna Ewing / Effie Reilly6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChris Grund / Janice Greathouse vs Donna Condon / CAROLYN HELMS7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Tsukalas / Kathy Morgan vs Mary Sanders / Nasrin Ejlali7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women-3.0 - Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Trudy Holder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Janice Greathouse
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Shirley Hunter-Welch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Chris Grund
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Dora Altman
published 2.5
1.99
Pauline Collier
published
Kathy Morgan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sheila Tucker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shirley Hunter-Welch + Janice Greathouse11656% games+0.2% vs expected
Shirley Hunter-Welch + Trudy Holder5253% games−1.4% vs expected
Sheila Tucker + Trudy Holder5651% games−2.9% vs expected
Janice Greathouse + Trudy Holder6452% games−5.6% vs expected
Sheila Tucker + Janice Greathouse3451% games−9.2% vs expected
Kathy Morgan + Shirley Hunter-Welch2345% gamesnot enough data
Dora Altman + Chris Grund044 matchesnot enough data
Dora Altman + Shirley Hunter-Welch134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trudy Holder
30W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
Janice Greathouse
60W–30L career · 1 line in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Shirley Hunter-Welch
25W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
2.5
Chris Grund
12W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%66%34%
2.44
2.5
Dora Altman
7W–24L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pauline Collier
5W–21L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
1.99
Kathy Morgan
12W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sheila Tucker
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.