Teams

MT TAM RC 65AW7.0A

2025 ADULT 65&Over · Women 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-18vs CONCORD TC/WILLOW PASS PK 65AW7.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesLinda Gonzalez / Lynn Tsumoto vs Julie Cahill / Kathleen Pruden0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Paula Loeffler
published
3.15
Kay Fields
published
3.14
Kim Garrett
published
3.10
Vicki Trent
published
2.92
Kathleen Walsh
published
2.71
Dana Vilas
published 3
Judith Lombardi
published
Kristine Lienhart
published
Linda Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Shirley
published
Nicola Trwst
published
Olivia Rolnick
published
Paulette Moe
published
Sue Pearlstein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Walsh + Kay Fields123 matchesnot enough data
Paulette Moe + Melissa Shirley123 matchesnot enough data
Olivia Rolnick + Vicki Trent123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paula Loeffler
17W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
Kay Fields
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.15
Kim Garrett
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.14
Vicki Trent
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Kathleen Walsh
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Dana Vilas
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
Judith Lombardi
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristine Lienhart
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Gonzalez
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Shirley
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicola Trwst
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Olivia Rolnick
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paulette Moe
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sue Pearlstein
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.