Teams

Halstead - Camp Creek

2025 OWB TriLevel 18 & Over · 3.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-06vs Schneider - Camp CreekSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTiffany Harran / Cindy Krutz vs Summer King / Meredith Sullivan7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCarrie Halstead / Brittany Tarver vs Tina Rickards-Fuller / Carol Southerland5-7, 1-6
2025-10-16vs Schneider - Camp CreekLost 12
L#1 DoublesJanet Parfitt / Tiffany Harran vs Suzanne Harman / Catherine Morgan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarci Knauss / Brittany Tarver vs Maria Schneider / Denise Thompson7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAngela Mathis / Trudy Marlow vs Devan Watkins / Amy Mausert0-6, 0-6
2025-09-25vs Schneider - Camp CreekWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarci Knauss / Brittany Tarver vs Debbie Watson / Catherine Morgan6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCara Brown / Jodi Pratt vs Heather Cooper / Gloria Schulz7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cindy Krutz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Tiffany Harran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Donna Capozzoli
published
3.14
Marci Knauss
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Valerie Collier
published
3.12
Carrie Halstead
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.05
Brittany Tarver
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.99
Amanda Edwards
published 3
2.94
Cara Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Jodi Pratt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Geeta Lochan
published
2.76
Cliffy Beal
published 3
Courtney Wiggins
published 3
Angela Mathis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Janet Parfitt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kristen Freeman
published
Lindsay Aydelotte
published
Lisa Incaudo
published
Shellie Watson
published
Trudy Marlow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Halstead + Jodi Pratt4246% games−14.3% vs expected
Brittany Tarver + Marci Knauss314 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Edwards + Cara Brown213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cindy Krutz
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tiffany Harran
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Donna Capozzoli
6W–15L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
Marci Knauss
19W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Valerie Collier
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
3
Carrie Halstead
21W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
3
Brittany Tarver
31W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Amanda Edwards
16W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Cara Brown
19W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Jodi Pratt
19W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Geeta Lochan
25W–40L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Cliffy Beal
3W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Courtney Wiggins
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Angela Mathis
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Janet Parfitt
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kristen Freeman
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lindsay Aydelotte
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Incaudo
0W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shellie Watson
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Trudy Marlow
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.