Teams

Yadkin/Bryan/18 3.5/OT

2025 Yadkin Valley Singles 18 & Over · Women 3.5 - Monday Night

8 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-18vs Yadkin/White/18+3.5 SinglesLost 02
L#1 SinglesWalker Jones vs Nancy Hart1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKatelyn Chapman vs Rebecca Hartsough2-6, 2-6
2025-07-28vs Yadkin/White/18+3.5 SinglesLost 03
L#1 SinglesJennifer Bryan vs Melissa Faulkner2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesWalker Jones vs Rebecca Hartsough6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesClaire Devon vs Nora Ferrell2-6, 1-6
2025-07-21vs Yadkin/Johnson/18 3.5 SinglesWon 20
W#1 SinglesBrandi Jacques vs Hillary Stevens6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCallie Bartock vs Mariela Arias6-1, 7-5
2025-07-07vs Yadkin/White/18+3.5 SinglesLost 02
L#2 SinglesGaines Douglas vs Nancy Hart6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesClaire Devon vs Rebecca Hartsough1-6, 2-6
2025-06-30vs Yadkin/Johnson/18 3.5 SinglesWon 21
W#1 SinglesCallie Bartock vs Donna Johnson6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesBrandi Jacques vs Emily Mustin6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesClaire Devon vs Carol Parker2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-06-16vs Yadkin/White/18+3.5 SinglesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesGaines Douglas vs Hannah Giles2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesKatelyn Chapman vs Whitley Sheffield6-2, 6-4
2025-06-09vs Yadkin/Johnson/18 3.5 SinglesWon 21
W#1 SinglesJennifer Bryan vs Hillary Stevens6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesWalker Jones vs Mariela Arias6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesAlissa Williams vs Carol Parker6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 - Monday Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Gaines Douglas
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Katelyn Chapman
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.29
Callie Bartock
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Brandi Jacques
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Walker Jones
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.13
Jennifer Bryan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.85
Claire Devon
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.85
Alissa Williams
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Walker Jones + Katelyn Chapman314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gaines Douglas
38W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.62
Katelyn Chapman
53W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Callie Bartock
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Brandi Jacques
19W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Walker Jones
35W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
Jennifer Bryan
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
Claire Devon
12W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Alissa Williams
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.