Teams

USTA Atlanta/Jill Coco

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 4.5 Women (Carolyn Watkins)

18 players · average NTRP 4.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.5 Women (Carolyn Watkins) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Tracy Hobbs
published
4.47
Sue Leffler
published
4.45
Jenifer Childress
published
4.40
Heather Borreca
published
4.35
Dena Risher
published 4.5
4.32
Jill Coco
published
4.26
Kelsey Arnall
published
4.25
Jamie Lunceford
published
4.19
Kathy Solomon
published
4.14
Guicela Leal
published
4.12
Madison Claytor
published
4.07
Jane McNeil
published
4.03
Melanie Sanders
published
3.92
Debra Gotting
published 4.5
3.83
Megan Ross
published
Jennifer Deaton
published
Stacy Lacy
published
Vanessa Woeste
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Hobbs + Jill Coco11172% games+13.7% vs expected
Kathy Solomon + Jill Coco16461% games+7.2% vs expected
Tracy Hobbs + Sue Leffler14171% games+6.2% vs expected
Tracy Hobbs + Jenifer Childress11561% games+0.9% vs expected
Jenifer Childress + Jill Coco8256% games−6.4% vs expected
Kathy Solomon + Jane McNeil3545% games−16.1% vs expected
Tracy Hobbs + Kathy Solomon3454% gamesnot enough data
Sue Leffler + Jenifer Childress5164% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracy Hobbs
69W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
4.47
Sue Leffler
62W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
4.47
Jenifer Childress
53W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
4.45
Heather Borreca
27W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
Dena Risher
20W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
4.35
Jill Coco
66W–27L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
4.32
Kelsey Arnall
11W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.26
Jamie Lunceford
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
Kathy Solomon
42W–26L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
4.19
Guicela Leal
17W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
4.14
Madison Claytor
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
4.12
Jane McNeil
31W–24L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.07
Melanie Sanders
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
4.03
4.5
Debra Gotting
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.92
Megan Ross
27W–22L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Jennifer Deaton
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacy Lacy
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Vanessa Woeste
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.