Teams

GOLDMAN TC 18AW3.5B

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.29 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Emily Vainberg
published
3.77
Katelyn Lao
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.38
Catherine Saul
published 3.5
3.33
Stephanie Harvey
published
Dana Stevenson
published 3.5
3.25
CARA BALLARD
published 3.5
3.22
Mirella Bucci
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
3.20
Karen Brandman
published
3.19
April Trinh
published 3.5
3.14
Kelly Alberta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Tomoko Kunita
published
2.95
Meredith Wong
published
2.87
Helen Y Chang
published
2.79
Claudia Woo
published 3
2.69
Ann Capitan
published 3
2.57
Cate Degraw
published 3
Stefanie Sheridan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Pfannenstiel + Kelly Alberta6261% games+3.5% vs expected
Meredith Wong + Stephanie Harvey134 matchesnot enough data
Mirella Bucci + CARA BALLARD404 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Harvey + CARA BALLARD123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Vainberg
14W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
4.02
Katelyn Lao
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
3.5
Catherine Saul
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Stephanie Harvey
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Dana Stevenson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
CARA BALLARD
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Mirella Bucci
16W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Jessica Pfannenstiel
20W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
Karen Brandman
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
April Trinh
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Kelly Alberta
27W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Tomoko Kunita
12W–19L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.13
Meredith Wong
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
Helen Y Chang
3W–11L career · no lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.87
3
Claudia Woo
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Ann Capitan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Cate Degraw
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
Stefanie Sheridan
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.