Teams

Westwood Hassett / Payne

2021 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Weeknight Women · Richmond Adult 55 & Over Women 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-08-06vs Burkwood JohnsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesCaren Payne / Elizabeth West vs Frances Poehler / Ellen Bedichek4-6, 2-6
2021-08-02vs Raintree CooperSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCaren Payne / Barbara Hassett vs Lorraine Harvey / Lorraine McGehee4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLil Racelis / SanDee Gammon vs Anne Sansom / Ruth Berens7-5, 6-2
2021-07-23vs Burkwood ClarkWon 10
W#3 DoublesSanDee Gammon / Lil Racelis vs Lisa Adkins / Mary Allen7-5, 6-4
2021-07-19vs ACAC PetersWon 20
W#2 DoublesCaren Payne / Elizabeth Martin vs Donna Barrett / Alicia Barnett6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLil Racelis / SanDee Gammon vs Jennifer Cubitt / Hilary Brodsky6-1, 6-2
2021-06-28vs Woodlake CookseyWon 10
W#1 DoublesBarbara Hassett / Caren Payne vs Peggy McElgunn / Jeanean Phelps6-4, 7-6
2021-06-21vs ACAC LarueWon 10
W#2 DoublesSanDee Gammon / Lil Racelis vs Kathryn Williams / Maureen Sisti6-3, 6-3
2021-06-07vs Randolph Macon FlowersWon 20
W#1 DoublesCaren Payne / Barbara Hassett vs Amy Scherer / Sharon Camden6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLil Racelis / SanDee Gammon vs Victoria Galiffa / Donna Mourtzakis7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Barbara Hassett
published 4
3.57
SanDee Gammon
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.27
Cherie Warfield
published 3.5
3.25
Elizabeth West
published 3.5
3.22
Lil Racelis
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.99
Caren Payne
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.97
Renee Gilman
published
2.88
Annette King
published 3
Janet Livick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lil Racelis + SanDee Gammon13564% games+7.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barbara Hassett
5W–6L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.75
3.5
SanDee Gammon
123W–74L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Cherie Warfield
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Elizabeth West
5W–9L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
Lil Racelis
116W–94L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Caren Payne
111W–68L career · 5 lines in 2021
54%46%<1%
2.99
Renee Gilman
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Annette King
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
2.88
Janet Livick
6W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.