Teams

Brackett/Memphis

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 6.5 18 & Over Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-30vs Bay/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesGabe LaBonia / John Manshack vs William Huang / Corey Richter7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJonathan Jussely / Hunter Mitchell vs Bryan Moore / Aalap Valia6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Mikl / Ryan Coopwood vs Drew Mascolino / Vinod Maller6-3, 6-3
2026-08-23vs Tatum/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesCashe Shows / Sharpe Smith vs Jean-Francois Lejeune / Muhammad Raza6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJeffery Suber / Hunter Mitchell vs Alan Kirk / Jason Huggins7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDiego Capone / John Stukenborg vs Keith Brower / James Cunningham6-1, 6-2
2026-08-09vs Pedro/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesJonathan Jussely / John Manshack vs Michael Mohler / Casey Hagans6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSharpe Smith / Cashe Shows vs Jonathan Mohler / Junwang Xu6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRyan Coopwood / John Stukenborg vs Scott Hirsch / Ryan Aghabeg7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 18 & Over Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Brandon Brackett
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.43
Cashe Shows
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Jonathan Jussely
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Jeffery Suber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Gabe LaBonia
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Cade Bishop
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
John Manshack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
John Stukenborg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Sharpe Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
John Mikl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Ryan Coopwood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Peyton Clark
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Manshack + Jonathan Jussely5163% gamesnot enough data
Cade Bishop + Jonathan Jussely213 matchesnot enough data
Cashe Shows + Sharpe Smith303 matchesnot enough data
John Manshack + Ryan Coopwood303 matchesnot enough data
John Mikl + Brandon Brackett303 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Coopwood + John Stukenborg303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brandon Brackett
67W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.65
3.5
Cashe Shows
18W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
Jonathan Jussely
38W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
Jeffery Suber
56W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Gabe LaBonia
29W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Cade Bishop
37W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
John Manshack
68W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.12
John Stukenborg
28W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
Sharpe Smith
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05
John Mikl
23W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Ryan Coopwood
40W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.00
Peyton Clark
12W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.