Teams

LLDU-Dunn/Jetton 8.5 40

2025 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · 8.5 Women 40s

13 players · average NTRP 4.15 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-14vs LJSZ-Szilagyi-JettonLost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Hoglund / Bridget Castoria vs Lori Woods / Julie Mudge6-7, 4-2
L#2 DoublesKristin Davis / Linda Radovich vs Sachi Denny / Phebby Benton1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnnie Perrino / Margaret Gilmore vs Janet Szilagyi / Lori Scherrman6-2, 6-2
2025-10-13vs LJPA-Patterson/CSD SpartanWon 20
W#1 DoublesBridget Castoria / Sarah Hoglund vs Jennifer Joiner / Nancy Zylstra6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKristin Davis / Linda Radovich vs Jennifer Jenkins / Alison Siebold6-0, 6-2
2025-10-06vs LTDU-Dudan/JettonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY / Jill Hulse-Mack vs Amy Ward / Frances Daymude1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDiofra Azucenas / Linda Radovich vs Bibi Muraira / Lauren Hession6-2, 6-2
2025-10-01vs LCSW-Swanson-Milligan/WestportWon 20
W#2 DoublesBridget Castoria / Sarah Hoglund vs Renee Fleishman / C E Swanson7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKristin Davis / Danielle Delancey vs Julie Brizard / Leila Riccardelli6-2, 6-0
2025-09-15vs LCSW-Swanson-Milligan/WestportWon 30
W#1 DoublesBridget Castoria / Sarah Hoglund vs Stacy Agar / Elizabeth Krogstie7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDiofra Azucenas / Lisa Dunn vs Robin Dann / Cheryl Woodruff6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKristin Davis / Danielle Delancey vs Kathleen Milligan / Becky Heflin6-3, 6-1
2025-09-09vs LTDU-Dudan/JettonWon 21
W#1 DoublesBridget Castoria / Amy Brandon vs Barbara Moore / Jennifer Schreck3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristin Davis / Linda Radovich vs Bibi Muraira / Ann Hughes6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesYin Chee Chin / Annie Perrino vs Lauren Hession / Susan Davis5-7, 1-6
2025-09-08vs LJPA-Patterson/CSD SpartanWon 10
W#3 DoublesCharlene Whichel / Linda Radovich vs Jodi Patterson / Leslie Shipley6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-25vs LJSZ-Szilagyi-JettonWon 21
W#1 DoublesBridget Castoria / Sarah Hoglund vs Ming Keadle / Janet Marek6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMargaret Gilmore / Danielle Delancey vs Lori Woods / Julie Mudge6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY / Jill Hulse-Mack vs Lori Scherrman / Debbie Newman5-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women 40s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.29
Diofra Azucenas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Bridget Castoria
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.22
Margaret Gilmore
published
4.01
Sarah Hoglund
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.99
Yin Chee Chin
published
3.98
Danielle Delancey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.86
Linda Radovich
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.85
Susan Lunsford
published
3.78
Charlene Whichel
published 4
3.62
Annie Perrino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Amy Brandon
published 4
3.21
Jill Hulse-Mack
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Hulse-Mack + Annie Perrino5848% games+1.0% vs expected
Bridget Castoria + Sarah Hoglund11459% games−4.3% vs expected
MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY + Sarah Hoglund10070% gamesnot enough data
Linda Radovich + Annie Perrino3554% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Hoglund + Annie Perrino6164% gamesnot enough data
Bridget Castoria + Danielle Delancey3248% gamesnot enough data
Bridget Castoria + Margaret Gilmore123 matchesnot enough data
Bridget Castoria + Annie Perrino303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY
46W–31L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
4.39
4.5
Diofra Azucenas
99W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Bridget Castoria
122W–68L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
4.26
Margaret Gilmore
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.22
4
Sarah Hoglund
94W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
4.01
Yin Chee Chin
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.99
4.5
Danielle Delancey
51W–28L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.98
4
Linda Radovich
85W–82L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.86
Susan Lunsford
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Charlene Whichel
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Annie Perrino
111W–109L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Amy Brandon
16W–30L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Jill Hulse-Mack
70W–101L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.