Teams

NancyHolly

2022 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-12vs rally.Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Edwards / Miranda Edwards vs Patricia Coats / Amy Quilter5-7, 4-6
2022-08-02vs Doubles or NothingWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Edwards / Holly Ng vs Angela Ahluwalia / Jiarui Ge4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-07-22vs Fun DoublesWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Edwards / Holly Ng vs Dawn Sabin / Lynn Casey6-3, 6-4
2022-07-15vs Chicken DinnerWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Edwards / Holly Ng vs Margaret Cobb / Marla Vasilatos6-1, 7-6
2022-07-13vs Dash-MolineWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Edwards / Holly Ng vs Shawna Dash / Mari Moline6-3, 6-3
2022-06-28vs Johnson/BrennockWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Edwards / Holly Ng vs Kristin Brennock / Chauntelle Johnson6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings52 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fletcher-Bursiek6060028
2SunBloch6060026
3Three5 - Joh6060143
4good carbs6060340
5Tennis Peaches5151227
6Crews5151239
7Opp5151242
8NancyHolly5151344
9Double Shots-Newgord5151445
10Chi Sistahs5151555
11Heart Body and Crema4141440
12Team McKinney4242539
13Karalyn & Heidi4242557
14Fun Doubles4242652
15rally.4242659
16Preciado4242754
17Dare Doubles-Leung3232432
18Double Cheers3232439
19No Faults3333659
20Dare Doubles-Lee3333649
21Double Shots-Quam3333652
22Blake3333754
23Island Girls3333855
24Volley Dolly’s3333861
25Huynh-Dubs3333864
26Shot Girls2323648
27Codemasters2323753
28Dash-Moline2424865
29In the Wild 2.02424865
30CGMR2424847
31Fun haver's - Linnell/Tracy2424867
32Millertime2424857
33Doubles R Us2424957
34Ice Cream Truck2424958
35Buck-wild 3.52424965
36Holland/Kaghan2424967
37RomaLi2424959
38Graham Fun in the Sun2424956
39DoublesTroubles2424965
40Kvong-Gher24241069
41Summer Lov'n1414857
42Love Handles15151064
43Holm-Green15151072
44Backs in Action15151061
45GPT15151061
46ETC-Larsen15151171
47Johnson/Brennock15151171
48ACM15151172
49Relyea06061273
50Sun Goddesses06061274
51Birch/Gerard (Weekend/Weeknights only)06061272
52Double Macs06061274

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Miranda Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Holly Ng
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.86
Nancy Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Edwards + Holly Ng131248% games−6.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Miranda Edwards
45W–41L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.94
3.5
Holly Ng
130W–81L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
Nancy Edwards
111W–167L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.