Teams

LCTA18/Courcoux/SneeFarm

USTA 18 & Over Adult Mixed Doubles · 6.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Alexandra Wright
published 3.5
3.75
Brent Herlong
published 4
3.71
Lauren Courcoux
published
3.44
Andrew Harmon
published 3.5
3.28
Kimberly Mathewes
published
3.07
Katie Hakimi
published
2.90
Brad Wright
published 3
2.88
Michael Hakimi
published
2.84
Holly Herlong
published 3
2.64
Louis Courcoux
published
2.62
Eric Sigman
published 2.5
2.60
Olivia Sigman
published
Karen Harmon
published
Rachael Kuhn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brad Wright + Alexandra Wright5163% games+14.5% vs expected
Karen Harmon + Andrew Harmon4359% games+7.7% vs expected
Olivia Sigman + Eric Sigman2346% gamesnot enough data
Katie Hakimi + Michael Hakimi314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alexandra Wright
83W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.95
4
Brent Herlong
68W–44L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
Lauren Courcoux
69W–28L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Andrew Harmon
57W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.44
Kimberly Mathewes
70W–33L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
Katie Hakimi
45W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Brad Wright
39W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.90
Michael Hakimi
27W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Holly Herlong
62W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
Louis Courcoux
20W–30L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
2.64
2.5
Eric Sigman
15W–19L career · no lines in 2023
0%18%82%
2.62
Olivia Sigman
25W–37L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.60
Karen Harmon
30W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachael Kuhn
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.