Teams

Boring 18

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - IDAHO FALLS · Women 2.5 - 18 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 2.67 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-06-19vs PackerLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarcie Cromwell / Tanya Cromwell vs Jennifer Sewell / Taralynn Sibbett1-6, 2-6
2024-06-11vs JohnsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesJill M Lucas / Marcie Cromwell vs Cherie Ball / Nichole Ball1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAbigail Belnap vs Aleesa Wilcox6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDeah Smith / Gracie Hanson vs Lindsey Johnson / Lisa Hone6-3, 7-5
2024-06-06vs Trimp 18Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMarcie Cromwell / Tanya Cromwell vs Sonja Facer / Monica Kuhn0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesDeah Smith vs Carmen Runyan6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAbigail Belnap / Jill M Lucas vs Karren Trimp / KyTanna Kallgren6-2, 6-2
2024-06-04vs PackerLost 03
L#1 DoublesKeisha Wilson / Jill M Lucas vs Mia Packer / Kara Petersen1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesGracie Hanson vs Jennifer Sewell4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDeah Smith / Marcie Cromwell vs Lisa Packer / Heather Redd0-6, 0-6
2024-05-30vs JohnsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesKeisha Wilson / Tanya Cromwell vs Aleesa Wilcox / Cherie Ball1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAbigail Belnap vs Hailey Bradshaw6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesWendy Boring / Deah Smith vs Lisa Hone / Cori Cannon6-1, 7-6
2024-05-29vs Trimp 18Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDeah Smith / Gracie Hanson vs Shirlee Robertson / Monica Kuhn5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWendy Boring / Jill M Lucas vs Sonja Facer / Mandy Hall0-6, 0-6
2024-05-21vs PackerLost 03
L#1 DoublesTanya Cromwell / Keisha Wilson vs Lisa Packer / Mia Packer0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDeah Smith vs Emily McCormick0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWendy Boring / Gracie Hanson vs Jennifer Sewell / Ashley Brusman2-6, 4-6
2024-05-15vs JohnsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarcie Cromwell / Tanya Cromwell vs Brooke Bedke / Lisa Hone6-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesAbigail Belnap vs Aleesa Wilcox6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJill M Lucas / Gracie Hanson vs Lindsey Johnson / Nichole Ball2-6, 1-6
2024-05-13vs Trimp 18Won 21
L#1 DoublesWendy Boring / Jill M Lucas vs Sonja Facer / Sharon Oliver3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAbigail Belnap vs Monica Kuhn6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKeisha Wilson / Gracie Hanson vs Mandy Hall / Linda Hawley2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 2.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Trimp 1836121535246
2Johnson36101737260
3Boring 183681939268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.46 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.56
Abigail Belnap
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.36
Wendy Boring
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Deah Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Gracie Hanson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Jill M Lucas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Marcie Cromwell
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Tanya Cromwell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tanya Cromwell + Marcie Cromwell033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Abigail Belnap
13W–11L career · 5 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
2.56
2.5
Wendy Boring
14W–19L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%84%16%
2.36
2.5
Deah Smith
2W–4L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Gracie Hanson
3W–6L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jill M Lucas
1W–5L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marcie Cromwell
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tanya Cromwell
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.