Teams

MO - Moore/Stokes

2025 Adult 18 & Over Men Winter - Mobile · 4.5 Men Winter

12 players · average NTRP 4.43 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-06vs MTC - SandsWon 30
W#1 DoublesChase Robertson / John O'Brien vs Zachary Hubbard / Kenny Sands6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJordi Coupe vs Patrick Yamane6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJack Meador / Les Steiner vs Thomas Lockard / George May6-1, 6-0
2025-04-06vs MTC - SandsWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Moore / Jack Meador vs Zachary Hubbard / Jeremy Tapper6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJordi Coupe vs Vincent Leo McZeek6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesLes Steiner vs Kenny Sands6-4, 6-0
2025-02-18vs MTC - SandsWon 40
W#1 DoublesJack Meador / Jacambrian Madlock vs Kenny Sands / Thomas Lockard6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLes Steiner vs Patrick Yamane6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTrey Hamlin / Craig Campbell vs Jonathan Maddison / Zachary Hubbard6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJordi Coupe vs Vincent Leo McZeek6-2, 6-4
2025-02-12vs MTC - SandsWon 30
W#1 DoublesJacob Stokes / Jacambrian Madlock vs Jeremy Tapper / Josh Bowers6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJack Meador / Craig Campbell vs Zachary Hubbard / George May6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLes Steiner vs Patrick Yamane6-2, 6-1
2025-02-04vs MTC - SandsWon 31
W#1 DoublesLes Steiner / Craig Campbell vs Larry Trice / Jeremy Tapper6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJordi Coupe vs Kenny Sands6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMark Moore / Jacob Stokes vs Kenneth Strong / Brian Dorgan2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCedric Nitz vs Vincent Leo McZeek3-6, 4-6
2025-01-30vs MTC - SandsWon 50
W#1 DoublesJack Meador / Jacob Stokes vs Jeremy Tapper / Larry Trice6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesChad Necaise vs Kenny Sands6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesWilliam Hooper / Les Steiner vs Zachary Hubbard / Jonathan Maddison4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJordi Coupe vs Vincent Leo McZeek6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNathan Smith / Trey Hamlin vs Kenneth Strong / Brian Dorgan2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 4.5 Men Winter
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MO - Moore/Stokes602827130

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Cedric Nitz
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.39
Craig Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.37
Chase Robertson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.33
Jack Meador
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.32
Jacob Stokes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.20
John O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
Les Steiner
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.95
Chad Necaise
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Jacambrian Madlock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jordi Coupe
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Trey Hamlin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
William Hooper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John O'Brien + Chase Robertson4167% games+6.4% vs expected
Jack Meador + Les Steiner303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cedric Nitz
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%24%
4.41
4.5
Craig Campbell
11W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
4.39
4.5
Chase Robertson
32W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%84%16%
4.37
4.5
Jack Meador
15W–0L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.33
4.5
Jacob Stokes
9W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
4.32
John O'Brien
17W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
Les Steiner
24W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Chad Necaise
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.95
4
Jacambrian Madlock
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jordi Coupe
5W–0L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Trey Hamlin
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Hooper
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.