Teams

Andresen - PCC

2025 Escambia Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 4.25 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-04vs Crooke - SHLSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichael Yager / Alexia Rycroft vs Ken McCurdy / Jami Steinmetz6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesColton Wilson / Melanie Bell vs Eric Stewart / Angela Stewart6-4, 6-4
2025-07-31vs Escambia/McCall/18&Over8.0XLost 01
L#1 DoublesJosh Sitton / Alexia Rycroft vs Anthony Bonjorno / Debbie Wroten2-6, 4-6
2025-07-21vs Brown - PCCLost 01
L#3 DoublesColton Wilson / Melanie Bell vs Amanda Brown / Connor Teefey6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-07-19vs Miller - RS ClayLost 02
L#1 DoublesJosh Sitton / Alexia Rycroft vs Lubomir Kaderjak / Akiko Ichimasa0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesColton Wilson / Melanie Bell vs Ryan Elliott / Elizabeth Elliott0-6, 2-6
2025-07-14vs Richardson - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesMelanie Bell / Colton Wilson vs Cherie Tan / Stephen McCrory6-2, 6-2
2025-07-07vs Marino - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesJosh Sitton / Alexia Rycroft vs Cosme Barrios / Van Hughes6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Alexia Rycroft
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.03
Jennifer Passeretti
published
3.96
Josh Sitton
published
3.92
Colton Wilson
published 4
3.74
Michael Yager
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Lisa Andresen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Natalie Mcelhany
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Melanie Bell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Steven Bingert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mandy Blair
published
Zachary Schweigert
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Mcelhany + Zachary Schweigert303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alexia Rycroft
28W–18L career · 12 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
Jennifer Passeretti
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
4.03
Josh Sitton
4W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Colton Wilson
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.92
Michael Yager
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
Lisa Andresen
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.63
Natalie Mcelhany
29W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.62
Melanie Bell
39W–28L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
Steven Bingert
11W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Mandy Blair
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Zachary Schweigert
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.