Teams

Gi.Flynn55C

2026 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.29 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-13vs Sh.Elder55CWon 30
W#1 DoublesHolly Camak / Shelly Rogers vs Noelle Schofield / Kathy Bostrom3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWendy Burkard / Elizabeth Lyle vs Sherry Elder / Katherine Seawell-Lewis1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTeressa Paschaloudis / Marlea Ward vs Lori Elliott / Teresa Defrancesco6-2, 6-3
2026-08-11vs Ta.LeFevre55C6.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLuann Richardson / Marlea Ward vs Debbie Powell / Jorgelina Stroud4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesDebra Neville / Teressa Paschaloudis vs Laurie Compiano / Lisa Griffin2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesClare Bonifant / Jolyne Taylor vs Deb Lanier / Laura Caldwell5-7, 2-6
2026-08-06vs Pe.LeGaux55CWon 30
W#1 DoublesJolyne Taylor / Debra Neville vs Julie Sauls / Jamie Kerzner6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBunny Ratledge / Marlea Ward vs Christine Subasic / Sharon Fred7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLuann Richardson / Elizabeth Lyle vs Julie Lee / Vickie Dagit6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ca.Conzola55C6.540102780
2Ki.Manning55C3072877
3Ki.Lamb55C6.53063982
4Ta.LeFevre55C6.53193887
5Gi.Flynn55C3193989
6Ju.Shuey55C317512108
7Ca.Werder55C317512103
8Be.Robertson55C2154979
9Je.Fogleman55C227511112
10Pe.LeGaux55C225716115
11We.Sielaty55C224817128
12Ap.Lyon55C12451178
13Te.Jones55C136613103
14Sh.Elder55C133918129
15St.Grose55C03361390
16Je.Komes55C6.503271491
17Pa.Cochran55C0421020136
18Ka.Serow55C6.5043921133

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Jolyne Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Luann Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Bunny Ratledge
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Holly Camak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Wendy Burkard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Teressa Paschaloudis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Gina Goldthwaite
published 3.5
3.07
Lee Anne Oxford
published 3
3.00
Clare Bonifant
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Shelly Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Cornelia Shaw
published 3
2.77
Marlea Ward
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Debra Neville
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luann Richardson + Marlea Ward6258% games+6.8% vs expected
Teressa Paschaloudis + Cornelia Shaw51441% games+3.1% vs expected
Holly Camak + Jolyne Taylor14459% games+2.2% vs expected
Luann Richardson + Teressa Paschaloudis253547% games+0.9% vs expected
Clare Bonifant + Lee Anne Oxford4450% gamesnot enough data
Luann Richardson + Bunny Ratledge3353% gamesnot enough data
Luann Richardson + Cornelia Shaw134 matchesnot enough data
Teressa Paschaloudis + Lee Anne Oxford224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jolyne Taylor
140W–112L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Luann Richardson
83W–111L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Bunny Ratledge
60W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Holly Camak
17W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Wendy Burkard
74W–89L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Teressa Paschaloudis
56W–96L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Gina Goldthwaite
7W–7L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Lee Anne Oxford
83W–62L career · no lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Clare Bonifant
50W–40L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Shelly Rogers
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
91%9%<1%
2.83
3
Cornelia Shaw
34W–83L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Marlea Ward
60W–68L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Debra Neville
2W–14L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.