Teams

Prince, Terri

2026 Combo 40 & Over-JXN · Women 5.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-24vs Manuel, ElaineWon 21
W#1 DoublesGwynn Cunningham / Heather Drummond vs Vicki Rundlett / Sherry Bouldin6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTerri Prince / Nancy Miller vs Kim Maureen Price / Candice Ross6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesIvey Welch / Rachel Manning vs Stephanie Jierski / Lisa Gemar6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-08-17vs Powers, CatherineLost 12
L#1 DoublesTerri Prince / Nancy Miller vs Catherine Powers / Elizabeth Bailey3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAngie McKissack / Michelle Loftin vs Robyn Pressley / Dawn Vance1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesIvey Welch / Rachel Manning vs Amy Adcox / Tracy Roan4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-10vs Walters, LydiaLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa West / Terri Prince vs Wendy Ellis / Danette Tannehill4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAneda Julkenbeck / Rachel Manning vs Debbie Lominick / Dana Germany5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesGwynn Cunningham / Michelle Loftin vs Lissa Galloway / Katie Bumgarner6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Women 5.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Smith, Ashley2042430
2Walters, Lydia1021330
3Powers, Catherine1133647
4Coins, Jimmie0103637
5Prince, Terri02241069

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.33 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.48
Heather Drummond
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Melissa West
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Aneda Julkenbeck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.35
Angie McKissack
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.28
Ivey Welch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.25
Gwynn Cunningham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.22
Terri Prince
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.18
Michelle Loftin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ivey Welch + Michelle Loftin1427% gamesnot enough data
Melissa West + Aneda Julkenbeck134 matchesnot enough data
Ivey Welch + Angie McKissack033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heather Drummond
10W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
Melissa West
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47
3
Aneda Julkenbeck
2W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.39
3
Angie McKissack
1W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
85%15%<1%
2.35
Ivey Welch
2W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.28
Gwynn Cunningham
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
Terri Prince
2W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
2.22
Michelle Loftin
2W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.