Teams

LTA-Q GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-26vs BRMST BLACKWon 41
W#1 DoublesDaniel Baur / Wayne Cobb vs Phil Strobel / Andrew Klein3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDaniel Gray vs Drew Carroll6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMark Creek / John Schroeder vs John Post / Glenn Fleckenstein3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAndrew Fong vs Thomas Quinn7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDon Anderson / Nicholas Gluvna vs Philip Cangilla / Michael Walter6-1, 6-1
2026-05-19vs MEA NAVYWon 31
L#1 DoublesDaniel Baur / Andrew Fong vs Chris Gray / John Ruder4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEric Eiseman vs Samuel Elting6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWayne Cobb / Don Anderson vs Steve Craig / Brian Westnedge6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLance Dehning / Nicholas Gluvna vs Andy Pobywajlo / Andrew Grumhaus4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-05-16vs TTA ORANGEWon 41
W#1 DoublesWayne Cobb / Daniel Baur vs Christopher Prather / Kevin Grant1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEric Eiseman vs Clayton Wilson6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMark Creek / Nicholas Gluvna vs Fengdong Zhang / Kobe Joseph6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDaniel Gray vs John Calderon6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLance Dehning / Andrew Fong vs Thorsten Ohrstrom Sandgren / Lars Malmstrom6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2026-05-12vs BTA-F REDWon 32
L#1 DoublesDon Anderson / Nicholas Gluvna vs Emerson Hinzy / Steve Gold2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesEric Eiseman vs Michael Dobrzynski7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMark Creek / Wayne Cobb vs Marc Dolezal / Karim Belhaj2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDaniel Gray vs Andrew Schroeder1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLance Dehning / Andrew Fong vs Rick Killian / Chris Barge6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2026-04-28vs CVTA BLUEWon 32
L#1 DoublesDon Anderson / Mark Creek vs Nicolai Bachman / Thomas Meese3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesEric Eiseman vs Kelly McKee6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesWayne Cobb / Daniel Baur vs Eric Ruthrauff / Paul Austin6-3, 7-6
L#2 SinglesDaniel Gray vs George Kim2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAndrew Fong / Nicholas Gluvna vs Robert Harberg / Thomas Booth6-4, 6-3
2026-04-21vs BRMST BLACKWon 32
W#1 DoublesKeith Pollack / Wayne Cobb vs Drew Carroll / Andrew Klein6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDaniel Gray vs Thomas Quinn3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEric Eiseman / Don Anderson vs Glenn Fleckenstein / John Post6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMark Creek vs Joel Walter6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Schroeder / Andrew Fong vs Philip Cangilla / Michael Walter6-2, 6-0
2026-04-14vs MEA NAVYWon 41
L#1 DoublesDon Anderson / Mark Creek vs John Ruder / Steve Craig7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEric Eiseman vs Samuel Elting6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesWayne Cobb / Keith Pollack vs Andy Pobywajlo / Michael McDowell6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDaniel Gray vs Bill Martin7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAndrew Fong / John Schroeder vs William Sivy / Chris Gray6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Eric Eiseman
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.44
Lance Dehning
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Wayne Cobb
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.43
Mark Creek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Daniel Gray
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Nicholas Gluvna
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.34
John Schroeder
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Keith Pollack
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Andrew Fong
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 3.5
3.27
Daniel Baur
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Don Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wayne Cobb + Eric Eiseman6068% games+9.1% vs expected
Don Anderson + Daniel Baur5161% games+4.9% vs expected
Wayne Cobb + Daniel Baur5647% games−1.9% vs expected
Mark Creek + Don Anderson2349% games−3.0% vs expected
Mark Creek + Daniel Baur2346% gamesnot enough data
Wayne Cobb + Keith Pollack4160% gamesnot enough data
Mark Creek + Lance Dehning224 matchesnot enough data
Don Anderson + Nicholas Gluvna134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Eric Eiseman
43W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.58
Lance Dehning
16W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Wayne Cobb
76W–50L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Mark Creek
92W–67L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Daniel Gray
17W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
Nicholas Gluvna
19W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
John Schroeder
51W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Keith Pollack
23W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Andrew Fong
5W–2L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Daniel Baur
78W–38L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Don Anderson
44W–71L career · 6 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.