Teams

HBSQ-Hammers-Poletti

2021 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2020-10-18vs TCSP-PhillipsWon 30
W#1 DoublesBruce Adee / Gordon Williams vs Tony Auriemma / Wayne Kindsvogel6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRay Poletti / Scott Schlumberger vs Steve Suzuki / Stevan Phillips2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTom Breen / James Choi vs Rick Friedhoff / Alexander Friedrich6-3, 6-3
2020-10-10vs FC-The Great Lapu-Lapu-CalpeWon 30
W#1 DoublesBruce Adee / Gordon Williams vs Mike Brooks / James Freeman7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRay Poletti / Don Little vs Eric Eifrig / Ramon Calpe6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTom Breen / Willem Mager vs Charles David Dizon / Er-Jia Mao3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2020-10-04vs CAC/SL-GarsideLost 03
L#1 DoublesBruce Adee / Gordon Williams vs AL King / Lloyd Sandquist3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKenny Kramer / Willem Mager vs Martin Ruscha / Cyrus Knowles3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRay Poletti / Paul Reni vs Gary Garside / Phillip Sabin6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2020-09-20vs EDG-Heavy Hitters-SchelleyWon 21
L#1 DoublesRay Poletti / Don Little vs Raymond Hsia / Gilbert Lin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKenny Kramer / George Sampson vs Lee Schelley / Thomas Hansen6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesScott Schlumberger / Willem Mager vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2020-09-12vs BETC-IkedaLost 12
W#1 DoublesGordon Williams / Bruce Adee vs Zane Blegen / Mark Weiser6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTom Breen / Kenny Kramer vs Lawson Mansfield / Michael Duby0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesWillem Mager / James Choi vs Steve Ikeda / Roy Higashi2-6, 4-6
2020-09-06vs WSC-PilawskiWon 30
W#1 DoublesBruce Adee / Gordon Williams vs Peter Sefton / Robert Moore6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRay Poletti / Paul Reni vs Ray Hisayasu / Bruce Ludwig7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGeorge Sampson / Scott Schlumberger vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · 7.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CAC/SL-Garside601714118
2RBW-Coe5114410115
3TCSP-The Longshots-Kotha5114411100
4STC-Campbell5113511134
5CP-Lords-Paulson5112613133
6HBSQ-Hammers-Poletti4212615134
7FC-Basha4211719152
8FC-The Great Lapu-Lapu-Calpe339919155
9AYTC (OUTDOORS) Aces@AmyYee-Edwards3371122148
10EDG-Heavy Hitters-Schelley339924182
11MC-Tigers-Sato3371126184
12HBSQ-Wharf Rats 55-Strong2481022171
13AYTC (OUTDOORS) Patz2471124174
14WSC-Full Metal Rackets-Hummer2471125175
15BETC-Kraken-Wu2481025179
16WSC-Pilawski1531530203
17BC-Sekins/Manning0641430196
18TCSP-Phillips0611735215

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Gordon Williams
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Scott Schlumberger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Kenny Kramer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Don Little
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
George Sampson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Bruce Adee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Willem Mager
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.05
James Choi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Ray Poletti
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Paul Reni
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 0
Tom Breen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bruce Adee + Kenny Kramer10263% games+5.7% vs expected
Bruce Adee + Gordon Williams511462% games+0.8% vs expected
George Sampson + Kenny Kramer3450% games−1.5% vs expected
Bruce Adee + George Sampson8555% games−5.4% vs expected
George Sampson + Gordon Williams18364% gamesnot enough data
Bruce Adee + Ray Poletti8459% gamesnot enough data
Bruce Adee + Tom Breen5171% gamesnot enough data
Scott Schlumberger + Willem Mager5171% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gordon Williams
121W–40L career · 9 lines in 2021
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Scott Schlumberger
59W–35L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Kenny Kramer
85W–49L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Don Little
40W–26L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
George Sampson
110W–52L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Bruce Adee
160W–67L career · 5 lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.13
3
Willem Mager
60W–45L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
James Choi
13W–18L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Ray Poletti
50W–41L career · 5 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
0
Paul Reni
50W–35L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
0
Tom Breen
38W–19L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.