Teams

STC-Robinson

2022 OH OV SUMMER A55&O Dayton · 2022 SUMMER Daytime A55&O 7.0 WOMEN Dayton

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-13vs QRRC-HeatonLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatricia Robinson / Marianna Wright vs Milagros Layrisse / Kendra Roth4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Hart / Terri Logan vs Marianne Saunders / Teri MacAulay0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKimberly Robinson / Donna Stafford vs Mary Whiting / Sara Walk1-6, 6-7
2022-07-23vs SRTC-BoykinLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatricia Robinson / Marianna Wright vs Lindsay Bremar / Chetana Wilkins5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Robinson / Donna Stafford vs Lori James / Bonnie Bennett1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCharlene Schmidt / Terri Logan vs Sonja Johannes / Janice Bensman5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-07-09vs SRTC-BoykinLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Conrad / Cindy Weikert vs Chetana Wilkins / Lindsay Bremar4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAnnette Ross-Gray / Charlene Schmidt vs Sonja Johannes / Deidra Boykin6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHarriet Stewart / Karima Buchholz vs Pam Howell / Lori James0-6, 2-6
2022-06-25vs QRRC-HeatonWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Robinson / Donna Stafford vs Milagros Layrisse / Kendra Roth2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPatricia Robinson / Charlene Schmidt vs Kim Gilbert / Marina Wille6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCatherine Lane / Harriet Stewart vs Ruth Blum / Paula Stoecklein5-7, 0-6
2022-06-11vs SRTC-BoykinLost 03
L#1 DoublesCindy Wehrkamp / Roxie Ballard vs Pam Howell / Bonnie Bennett6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnnette Ross-Gray / Terri Logan vs Kim McCrae / Janice Bensman5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarianna Wright / Patricia Robinson vs Lori James / Lindsay Bremar1-6, 3-6
2022-06-04vs QRRC-HeatonWon 21
W#1 DoublesCindy Wehrkamp / Roxie Ballard vs Mary Whiting / Kendra Roth4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPatricia Robinson / Marianna Wright vs Donna Silvert / Christy Smith7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnnette Ross-Gray / Maggie Thomas vs Paula Stoecklein / Ruth Blum1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2022 SUMMER Daytime A55&O 7.0 WOMEN Dayton have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Cindy Wehrkamp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Charlene Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Donna Stafford
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Annette Ross-Gray
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.69
Patricia Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.69
Terri Logan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Catherine Lane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Cindy Weikert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Harriet Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karima Buchholz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kimberly Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Maggie Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marianna Wright
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Melissa Hart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Conrad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roxie Ballard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Conrad + Patricia Robinson3449% games+7.8% vs expected
Terri Logan + Michelle Conrad1550% games+4.5% vs expected
Annette Ross-Gray + Patricia Robinson253448% games+2.3% vs expected
Cindy Weikert + Michelle Conrad5450% games+2.2% vs expected
Donna Stafford + Kimberly Robinson9955% games+0.9% vs expected
Patricia Robinson + Kimberly Robinson4257% games−0.4% vs expected
Marianna Wright + Roxie Ballard5546% games−0.8% vs expected
Terri Logan + Annette Ross-Gray21241% games−2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cindy Wehrkamp
123W–55L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Charlene Schmidt
73W–66L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Donna Stafford
33W–56L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Annette Ross-Gray
82W–127L career · 3 lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.96
Patricia Robinson
120W–269L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Terri Logan
86W–153L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Catherine Lane
3W–44L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Cindy Weikert
21W–29L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Harriet Stewart
6W–56L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karima Buchholz
8W–21L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Kimberly Robinson
29W–43L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Maggie Thomas
7W–27L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Marianna Wright
27W–76L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Melissa Hart
20W–37L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Conrad
42W–48L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Roxie Ballard
34W–44L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.