Teams

GOLDEN GATEWY CW7.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

24 players · average NTRP 3.85 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
L#1 DoublesCatherine Lacey / Alexandra Wlassowsky vs Laura Kelly / Mary Anne Ruyle5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJoyce Noah-Vanhoucke / Judy McKie vs Amy Kleckner / Kendall Laidlaw1-6, 1-2
W#1 DoublesJanet Lautenberger / Joanne Poile vs Sally Brien / Michelle Philpot6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLeilani Latimer / Amelia Morris vs Lilian Kim / Mary Anne Ruyle5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJackie Keelan / Heather Weyand vs Janet Arnesty / Karen Forsthoff6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 23 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Janet Lautenberger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Hayley Burner
published 4
3.67
Heather Weyand
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Charito Aquino
published 4
3.64
Monica Goren
published
3.63
Pam Dineva
published
3.63
Judy McKie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Adele Anfinson
published 4
3.52
3.49
Amelia Morris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Catherine Lacey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Stephanie Shi
published
3.40
Anne Kavanagh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Alexandra Wlassowsky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Lorie Lambert
published
3.28
Leilani Latimer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Katherine Alevizos
published
3.24
Jennifer Koo
published
3.15
Jackie Keelan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Monica Reid
published
3.07
Joyce Noah-Vanhoucke
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Lummi Bae
published
3.01
Joanne Poile
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Koo + Monica Reid044 matchesnot enough data
Leilani Latimer + Anne Kavanagh314 matchesnot enough data
Jackie Keelan + Leilani Latimer213 matchesnot enough data
Jackie Keelan + Alexandra Wlassowsky123 matchesnot enough data
Joanne Poile + Janet Lautenberger303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janet Lautenberger
15W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Hayley Burner
13W–36L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Heather Weyand
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Charito Aquino
3W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.65
Monica Goren
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.64
Pam Dineva
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
Judy McKie
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Adele Anfinson
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Colby Matthiasson
4W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
4
Amelia Morris
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.49
4
Catherine Lacey
0W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
Stephanie Shi
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.42
3.5
Anne Kavanagh
13W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Alexandra Wlassowsky
16W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
Lorie Lambert
12W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
Leilani Latimer
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
Katherine Alevizos
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Jennifer Koo
10W–18L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Jackie Keelan
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Monica Reid
3W–18L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.11
Joyce Noah-Vanhoucke
8W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.07
Lummi Bae
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Joanne Poile
16W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Maryam Jabari Delucia
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.