Teams

Bagel Beagles-Mendez

Coed Social League · 5.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.72 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-27vs Racket Scientists-UngureanasuLost 12
W#1 Male DoublesMax Sugarman / Glenn Johnston vs Alex Zaharia / Leonard Ifrim6-2
L#1 Male SinglesMax Sugarman vs Mihai Petriuc3-6
L#1 Mixed DoublesGlenn Johnston / Almita Magbalot vs Becca Mischke / Mihai Petriuc2-6
2026-07-20vs Hot Pookies-SeiLost 03
L#1 Female DoublesMichelle Kim / Almita Magbalot vs Roseanna Cen / Momo Rutkin4-6
L#1 Male DoublesJulio Mendez / Glenn Johnston vs Will Sather / Randy Fan2-6
L#1 Male SinglesJulio Mendez vs Will Sather0-6
2026-07-13vs Rally & Rosé-McCorkindaleSplit 22
L#1 Female DoublesAlmita Magbalot / Jessica Fan vs Tina Mccorkindale / Lindsay Roitman3-6
W#1 Male DoublesGlenn Johnston / Jared Groff vs N/A6-0
L#1 Male SinglesJared Groff vs John Mannetti1-6
W#2 Mixed DoublesJared Groff / Sandra Cullen vs N/A6-0
2026-07-06vs Summer Pookies-SeiSplit 22
L#1 Female DoublesSandra Cullen / Angel Mach vs Mila Burdan / Liz Speigel6-7
L#1 Female SinglesMichelle Kim vs Mila Burdan3-6
W#1 Male SinglesJared Groff vs Kerem Oztelcan6-1
W#1 Mixed DoublesMax Sugarman / Sandra Cullen vs Kerem Oztelcan / Liz Speigel6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Michelle Kim
usually #1 Female Singles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Angel Mach
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Jared Groff
usually #1 Male Singles 100% · published 3
2.47
Max Sugarman
usually #1 Mixed Doubles 50%, also #1 Male Singles 50% · published 3
2.39
Sandra Cullen
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Mixed Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.30
Glenn Johnston
usually #1 Male Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Xiao Su
published 2.5
2.14
Julio Mendez
usually #1 Male Singles 100% · published 2.5
1.83
Almita Magbalot
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandra Cullen + Jared Groff41531% games−19.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Michelle Kim
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Angel Mach
0W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
4%92%3%
2.74
3
Jared Groff
16W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Max Sugarman
1W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47
2.5
Sandra Cullen
23W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.39
2.5
Glenn Johnston
6W–11L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30
2.5
Xiao Su
18W–46L career · no lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Julio Mendez
2W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.14
2.5
Almita Magbalot
1W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.