Teams

BROWN KL - Mixed 55s 4.0 Tues

2024 Piedmont Mixed 55 & Over · 4.0 Mixed Dbls Tues PM

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-24vs Lane - Mixed 55s 4.0 TuesLost 01
L#1 DoublesMyron Herron / Deborah Register vs Bill King / Libby Strickland3-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesJason Altmann / Deborah Register vs Paul Nolan / Joy Martin6-0, 6-0
2024-07-02vs Majestic - Mixed 55s 4.0 TuesLost 01
L#2 DoublesSallye Parker / Peter Cohen vs John Graves / Carrie Ganim4-6, 4-6
2024-06-26vs Smith/Milam - Mixed 55's 4.0 TuesLost 02
L#1 DoublesMyron Herron / Deborah Register vs Paul Juengel / Ann Evans6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSallye Parker / Clifton Mann vs Ann Morris / Fred Bushnell3-6, 6-7
2024-05-28vs Majestic - Mixed 55s 4.0 TuesLost 02
L#1 DoublesJason Altmann / Deborah Register vs Kimberly Eberhard / Charley Eberhard5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMyron Herron / Sallye Parker vs John Graves / Carrie Ganim4-6, 0-6
2024-05-22vs Smith/Milam - Mixed 55's 4.0 TuesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJason Altmann / Deborah Register vs Suzanne Rudy / Fred Bushnell7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mixed Dbls Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Jason Altmann
published
3.93
Peter Novosad
published
3.87
Peter Cohen
published
3.84
Brad McAmis
published 4
3.81
Deborah Register
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Catherine Tanner
published 4
3.64
Clifton Mann
published 4
3.59
Sallye Parker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Myron Herron
published
3.54
Minerva Loran
published
3.31
Kathy Brown
published
Janel Green
published
Ric Parker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Register + Peter Novosad303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Altmann
27W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
4.03
Peter Novosad
39W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.93
Peter Cohen
16W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Brad McAmis
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Deborah Register
208W–106L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Catherine Tanner
40W–39L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Clifton Mann
4W–17L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.64
Sallye Parker
146W–124L career · 3 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
Myron Herron
11W–18L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.55
Minerva Loran
13W–18L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
Kathy Brown
14W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
Janel Green
17W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ric Parker
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.