Teams

TOC.Gallo

2022 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Men

4 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-29vs TOC.FuWon 10
W#2 SinglesSergii Porokh vs Benjamin Katz6-4, 7-5
2022-11-21vs TOC.SachanSplit 11
W#2 SinglesSergii Porokh vs Manish Maheshwari6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesDan Podrasky vs Amit Sachan5-7, 4-6
2022-11-08vs TOC.SankarLost 12
W#1 SinglesAaron Heil vs Chirag Patel6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesSergii Porokh vs Srinivas Govindaraju2-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesDan Podrasky vs Anoop Sankar6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-11-01vs TOC.ChristensonWon 20
W#2 SinglesAaron Heil vs Jared Balcavage6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesDan Podrasky vs Jose Hazael Gonzalez6-1, 6-0
2022-10-25vs LOCH.HeaphyWon 20
W#1 SinglesSergii Porokh vs Scott Anderson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDan Podrasky vs Philip Singer6-3, 6-3
2022-10-18vs MVL.BhowmikWon 20
W#2 SinglesDan Podrasky vs Bharath Dheekonda4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesSergii Porokh vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-11Won 20
W#2 SinglesAaron Heil vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesSergii Porokh vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-20Split 11
L#1 SinglesDan Podrasky vs Chris Henderson2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesSergii Porokh vs SRINIVASRAGHAVA SURENDRA4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Daniel Gallo
published 4.5
3.87
Dan Podrasky
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.86
Sergii Porokh
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #3 Singles 29% · published 4
3.73
Aaron Heil
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aaron Heil + Sergii Porokh5261% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Gallo
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Dan Podrasky
67W–47L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Sergii Porokh
108W–115L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Aaron Heil
72W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.