Teams

Mcgehee/Higgins/OFRC 18s 5.5W Combo Mon PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women 18 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 14 6:30 PM
Olde Forest Racquet Club
Sep 21 7:30 PM
Pinetop Tennis Club
Sep 28 6:30 PM
Olde Forest Racquet Club
Oct 5 6:30 PM
vs
Olde Forest Racquet Club
2026-08-24vs Siesling 18s 5.5W Combo Mon PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesGinger Ballard / Julie Mcgehee vs Margaret Beck / Kaitlin Singh7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmanda Tapler / Jenifer Checo vs Radha Singh / Lisa Simmons7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathryn Roberts / Jennie Goforth vs Sharlotte Brooks / Jennifer Page5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-08-20vs Barnes 18s 5.5W Combo Mon PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesGinger Ballard / Julie Mcgehee vs Susan Barnes / Karin Rochester6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNicole Wurl / DEBORAH WELLS vs Olivia Beane / Katie Tucker6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAmanda Tapler / Chelsea Ward vs Lorraine Rusch / Sophia de Vries6-2, 6-3
2026-08-10vs Schuster 18s 5.5W Combo Mon PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesGinger Ballard / Nicole Wurl vs Suki Gutierrez / Tessa Olinger7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJenifer Checo / Jennie Goforth vs Julia Brodeur / Megan Stanley6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Mcgehee / Kathryn Roberts vs Carla Vilton / Zaira Arfeen6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Ginger Ballard
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.05
DEBORAH WELLS
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Jennie Goforth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Amanda Tapler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Kathryn Roberts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Jenifer Checo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Julie Mcgehee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.42
Nicole Wurl
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.18
Chelsea Ward
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ginger Ballard
90W–38L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.31
3
DEBORAH WELLS
30W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
Jennie Goforth
14W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.85
3
Amanda Tapler
2W–5L career · type M · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathryn Roberts
10W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Jenifer Checo
30W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%13%87%
2.66
Julie Mcgehee
15W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%38%62%
2.54
Nicole Wurl
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%73%27%
2.42
2.5
Chelsea Ward
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.