Teams

4 Avalon Mihalko

2023 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-08-27vs 5 ACAC NaylorSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristin Tetterton / Sarah Croft-Whelan vs Andrea Morrow / Kathie Naylor3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Voeks / Samantha Mier vs Liesl Delisio / Alicia Watkins6-7, 3-6
2023-08-20vs 3 MAC GreenspoonLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristin Tetterton / Meghan Pearsall vs Delaney Rhodus / Katie Hambrick4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Mihalko / Alice Ulrichs vs Susanne Nazur / Emily Huang7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSamantha Mier / Betsy Siewers vs Katherine Clapp / Kasey Hammond1-6, 3-6
2023-08-19vs 7 ACAC Davis Deuce DynamitesWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristin Tetterton / Sarah Croft-Whelan vs Dawn Kelsey / Anne Bane6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPatrice Shupack / Alice Ulrichs vs Yasmin Lutterbie / Dawn Toft6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKim Schultz / Ruma Adams vs Nikki Callaghan / Barbara Kasten6-4, 6-3
2023-08-13vs 10 Willow Oaks Moehling/GarnettWon 20
W#2 DoublesAnnmarie Lobred / Alice Ulrichs vs Mansi Shah / Heather Garnett6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Mihalko / Deborah Mason vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-06vs 8 MRTC Williams/Moseley @ BelmontLost 01
L#3 DoublesNancy Mihalko / Betsy Siewers vs Rochelle Purmasir / Ariel Trimiew3-6, 3-6
2023-08-02vs 6 ACAC StephensLost 02
L#1 DoublesNancy Mihalko / Deborah Mason vs Sarah Rowe / Valerie Stephens7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTeresa Lancaster / Kim Schultz vs Aimee Vaughn / Katherine Guerette1-6, 2-6
2023-07-27vs 2 ACAC LewisWon 10
W#3 DoublesNancy Mihalko / Alice Ulrichs vs Victoria Bradt / Nancy Jamer7-5, 6-3
2023-07-23vs 1 Woodlake PoindexterLost 01
L#2 DoublesNancy Mihalko / Kim Schultz vs Kimberly Ritter / Christine Lemons1-6, 2-6
2023-07-13vs 9 Westwood Called to ServeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKim Schultz / Lara Green vs Elizabeth Diller / Becca Meekins0-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristin Tetterton / Sarah Croft-Whelan vs Margaret Burke / Ellie StJohn6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Kristin Tetterton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.56
Lara Green
published
3.56
Annmarie Lobred
published 4
3.44
Nancy Mihalko
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Meghan Pearsall
published
3.27
Alice Ulrichs
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Teresa Lancaster
published
3.23
Betsy Siewers
published 3.5
3.15
Kim Schultz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.83
Samantha Mier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Judiann Drash
published
Lisa Voeks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Mihalko + Kim Schultz7847% games−8.2% vs expected
Nancy Mihalko + Annmarie Lobred7159% gamesnot enough data
Samantha Mier + Kim Schultz1635% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Mihalko + Alice Ulrichs303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristin Tetterton
155W–104L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.83
Lara Green
10W–15L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Annmarie Lobred
154W–109L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Nancy Mihalko
182W–108L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
Meghan Pearsall
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
3.37
3.5
Alice Ulrichs
86W–77L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Teresa Lancaster
7W–23L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Betsy Siewers
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Kim Schultz
75W–79L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
Samantha Mier
32W–87L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.83
Judiann Drash
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Voeks
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.