Teams

FK - Nice Aces

2022 Marion Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult Women 40 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-21vs MARION - FK - WattsLost 02
L#2 DoublesPenny Terry / Leigh McPherson vs Caroline Murray / Elaine Parker4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDana Pine / Hollie Powell vs Debby Watts / Jennifer Hewitson2-6, 3-6
2022-05-15vs FK - SlattonWon 10
W#3 DoublesLori Croy / Carmen Rosario vs Mary Jeanne Walsh / Mae King6-3, 6-2
2022-05-09vs MARION - FK - WattsLost 01
L#2 DoublesDana Pine / Hollie Powell vs Debby Watts / Jennifer Boyd2-6, 1-6
2022-04-24vs FK - SlattonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLori Croy / Lisa McTaggart vs Yvonne Schappell / Erica Migliorati3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesHollie Powell / Wendy MacMurray vs Barbara Slatton / Linda Lademann6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-15vs MARION - FK - WattsLost 02
L#2 DoublesDana Pine / Hollie Powell vs Diana Royo / Amanda Miller4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Gibboney / Penny Terry vs Jennifer Boyd / Debby Watts3-6, 0-6
2022-04-09vs MARION - FK - WattsLost 01
L#1 DoublesLori Croy / Penny Terry vs Debby Watts / Jennifer Boyd1-6, 2-6
2022-04-03vs FK - SlattonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTerri Finn / Lori Croy vs Patti Hischmann / Barbara Slatton6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCarmen Rosario / Hollie Powell vs Yvonne Schappell / Linda Jones2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Drae Centonze
published 5
3.74
Dana Pine
published 4
3.68
Terri Finn
published
3.54
Lori Croy
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.48
Dina Sapienza
published 4
3.42
Penny Terry
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Hollie Powell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.27
Wendy MacMurray
published
Carmen Rosario
published 3.5
Nancy Little
published
Natalie Petsche
published
Pamela Plumlee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Penny Terry + Lori Croy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Drae Centonze
102W–22L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
4.51
4
Dana Pine
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Terri Finn
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Lori Croy
75W–42L career · 4 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Dina Sapienza
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
Penny Terry
52W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
3.42
3.5
Hollie Powell
26W–70L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Wendy MacMurray
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Carmen Rosario
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Little
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Natalie Petsche
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pamela Plumlee
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.