Teams

5 Westwood Gee

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.62 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-05vs 2 Westwood Singles Ladies - ManciniSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMary Gee vs Melissa Lloyd6-2, 6-3
L#3 SinglesBeth Wong vs Elizabeth Whiteside2-6, 3-6
2025-11-03vs 7 SCC Happy Hitters - PercyWon 21
W#1 SinglesMichelle Christian vs Michelle Foley7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAshley Allen vs Leslie Percy7-6, 6-3
L#3 SinglesKelly Noack vs Allison Moore6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-10-22vs 1 HCC GarnerWon 30
W#1 SinglesMary Gee vs Meghan Hale6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLauren Connor vs Kimberly Rudolph6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesEmily Mcanelly vs Kaitlin Levin6-0, 6-3
2025-10-20vs 8 Woodlake - Schiavone CorraziniWon 30
W#1 SinglesEmily Mcanelly vs Elizabeth Dunham6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAmanda Stamper vs Casey Wiedemann6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesKelly Noack vs Deborah Thexton6-4, 6-4
2025-10-15vs 6 KRAKrushers - GaritzWon 30
W#1 SinglesLauren Connor vs Kate Garitz6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMary Gee vs Luiza Bretas6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesAmanda Stamper vs Katie Smith6-0, 6-0
2025-10-05vs 3 Chestnut Oaks - Coyle 2.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesAmanda Stamper vs Nichole Sands6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesBeth Wong vs Heather Waltenbaugh6-0, 6-0
2025-09-24vs 4 Ridgetop Pugh SinglesLost 12
L#1 SinglesBeth Wong vs Grayson Honeycutt4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKelly Noack vs Katherine OHara4-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesNina Diersen vs Kerrissa MacPherson7-6, 6-3
2025-09-15vs 15 Stonehenge ZambitoWon 30
W#1 SinglesEmily Mcanelly vs Courtney Swecker6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMichelle Christian vs Cheryl Hughes6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAshley Allen vs Jenny Zubey6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Mary Gee
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.14
Lauren Connor
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.88
Emily Mcanelly
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.73
Amanda Stamper
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.62
Beth Wong
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.51
Michelle Christian
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.43
Ashley Allen
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.37
Kelly Noack
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Nina Diersen
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Gee + Emily Mcanelly4174% games+27.5% vs expected
Mary Gee + Lauren Connor303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Gee
38W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.17
Lauren Connor
38W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.14
3
Emily Mcanelly
26W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
2.5
Amanda Stamper
24W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%4%96%
2.73
2.5
Beth Wong
21W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%18%82%
2.62
Michelle Christian
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
2.5
Ashley Allen
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%71%29%
2.43
Kelly Noack
14W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.37
Nina Diersen
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.