Teams

RAFAEL RC CM7.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 7.5

24 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Michael Grady
published
3.99
Tony Gambardella
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
Nick Notti
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Paul McGeehan
published
3.89
Geoff Hazard
published
3.75
Jason Bousquet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Tripp Smith
published
3.72
Tommy Hellyer
published
3.69
3.64
Josh Quaas
published
3.62
Jeffrey Thornton
published
3.54
Benjamin McKeever
published 3.5
3.53
Stewart Clark
published
3.52
Robbert de Vries
published
3.44
Chris Beard
published 3.5
3.29
Steven Denebeim
published
3.29
Greg Martinez
published
3.26
Roland Davantes
published
Christopher Stewart
published 3.5
3.24
Harry Lewis
published
3.10
Matthew Alba
published
Geoff Greenlee
published
Matt Stanley
published
Phil Neal
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Beard + Roland Davantes6258% games+13.6% vs expected
Stewart Clark + Benjamin McKeever224 matchesnot enough data
Nick Notti + Paul McGeehan224 matchesnot enough data
Benjamin McKeever + Greg Martinez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Grady
20W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.02
Tony Gambardella
12W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
Nick Notti
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
Paul McGeehan
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
Geoff Hazard
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
Jason Bousquet
12W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Tripp Smith
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Tommy Hellyer
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Christopher Skelton
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Josh Quaas
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.64
Jeffrey Thornton
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
3.5
Benjamin McKeever
13W–10L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
Stewart Clark
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
Robbert de Vries
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Chris Beard
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Steven Denebeim
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.29
Greg Martinez
15W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Roland Davantes
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Christopher Stewart
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Harry Lewis
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Matthew Alba
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Geoff Greenlee
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Stanley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Phil Neal
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.